1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf00235717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postural readjustments induced by linear motion of visual scenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

38
225
5

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 469 publications
(272 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
38
225
5
Order By: Relevance
“…), swinging rooms (Lee and Lishman 1975), projected displays simulating a moving visual wall (van Asten et al 1988), tunnel, floor, or ceiling (Lestienne et al 1977;Soechting and Berthoz 1979), and visual roll rotations (Clement et al 1985;Dichgans et al 1972 (Berthoz et al 1979;Bles et al 1983;Bles et al 1980;Clement et al 1985;Dichgans et al 1972;Lestienne et al 1977), but oppositely directed body sways have also been reported in some subjects (van Asten et al 1988). One consistent finding has been the existence of a saturation effect; that is, increases in the amplitude of the visual field movement cause little or no additional postural sway (Bles et al 1980;Clement et al 1985;Lestienne et al 1977;van Asten et al 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), swinging rooms (Lee and Lishman 1975), projected displays simulating a moving visual wall (van Asten et al 1988), tunnel, floor, or ceiling (Lestienne et al 1977;Soechting and Berthoz 1979), and visual roll rotations (Clement et al 1985;Dichgans et al 1972 (Berthoz et al 1979;Bles et al 1983;Bles et al 1980;Clement et al 1985;Dichgans et al 1972;Lestienne et al 1977), but oppositely directed body sways have also been reported in some subjects (van Asten et al 1988). One consistent finding has been the existence of a saturation effect; that is, increases in the amplitude of the visual field movement cause little or no additional postural sway (Bles et al 1980;Clement et al 1985;Lestienne et al 1977;van Asten et al 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that the visual constancy is actively supported by referencing the visual stimuli to control signals producing motor actions, a process reminiscent of the sense of a constant position during isometric contractions. The suggestion that visual and motor systems are interdependent is well supported by experimental observations of different sensorimotor illusions in humans (Lackner & Dizio 1988;Lestienne et al 1977) and by neurophysiological studies in animals (Deliagina & Fagerstedt 2000).…”
Section: Getting Real About Invariantsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Sinusoidal movement of the visible surround produces a matching sinusoidal postural response [72; 128; 229; 263; 264], and the temporal coupling between stimulus and sway found to be controlled or influenced by such factors as motion parallax [38; 93], and image velocity [129], size and expansion ( [127], but see [72]). …”
Section: Visual Information In Postural Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With visual motion in the frontal or sideways plane, body sway shows a phase lead at low visual frequencies and a phase lag at higher frequencies [129]. This suggests an ability to track (or anticipate) visual field motion, so as to minimize the amount of relative displacement between the body and the environment [101].…”
Section: Visual Information In Postural Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%