2001
DOI: 10.1007/bf02874824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potato microtubers as research tools: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microtubers showed little or no apical dominance in this study. This is very surprising in view of the more intensive dormancy inherent in Russet Burbank as well as a number of reports indicating significant dormancy issues in microtubers (Coleman et al 2001). Perhaps, with the protocol used in this study, the natural gibberellins may play a more dominant role in the development of microtubers as well as in plants for a longer period of time when initiated from these microtubers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microtubers showed little or no apical dominance in this study. This is very surprising in view of the more intensive dormancy inherent in Russet Burbank as well as a number of reports indicating significant dormancy issues in microtubers (Coleman et al 2001). Perhaps, with the protocol used in this study, the natural gibberellins may play a more dominant role in the development of microtubers as well as in plants for a longer period of time when initiated from these microtubers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…An excellent review of microtuber performance was made by Coleman et al (2001). In general, they suggested that use of microtubers would become increasingly important in seed tuber production programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several components such as the rapid and near synchronous induction and growth that can be modified by using a range of exogenous compounds and even altering growth conditions, make the microtuber a valuable model system (Coleman et al, 2001). This technique reduces the time taken to yield seed tubers, lessen the number of field generations needed and ultimately in higher class seed tubers (Jones, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been numerous studies on potato microtuber production, but they have little bearing on the in vitro tuberization process from different origins of explants, and most of the studies have used complex media containing plant growth regulators that affect microtuber induction and dormancy (Coleman et al, 2001). However, it is clear that the most important factors during tuber formation period are a) sugar (sucrose) concentration in the culture medium; b) nitrogen content (interaction between sugar and nitrogen); and c) temperature and light (Nistor et al, 2010;El-Sawy et al, 2007;Ranalli, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tuberization in potato is a highly complex developmental process that can be induced under in vitro conditions throughout the year (Hoque, 2010). Furthermore, microtubers are very easy to carry and can be stored for a long time because they are small and cut weight (Nistor et al, 2010;Sakha et al, 2004;Coleman et al, 2001). In addition, they can be planted directly in the soil as a seed and can be produced during any period of the year with similar morphology and biochemical features to traditional tubers (Nistor et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%