2009
DOI: 10.33588/rn.4809.2008295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potenciales evocados cognitivos en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple remitente-recurrente y benigna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would result in a relatively small RT difference between responses for validly and invalidly cued target locations. Furthermore, this pattern of results should be especially likely to occur when target detection or discrimination does not require highly focused attention, as was the case in previous studies (Gonzalez-Rosa, et al, 2006; Vazquez-Marrufo, et al, 2008; Vázquez-Marrufo, et al, 2009). By contrast, the current study presented a salient peripheral cue, and target stimuli that were difficult to discriminate without focused attention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This would result in a relatively small RT difference between responses for validly and invalidly cued target locations. Furthermore, this pattern of results should be especially likely to occur when target detection or discrimination does not require highly focused attention, as was the case in previous studies (Gonzalez-Rosa, et al, 2006; Vazquez-Marrufo, et al, 2008; Vázquez-Marrufo, et al, 2009). By contrast, the current study presented a salient peripheral cue, and target stimuli that were difficult to discriminate without focused attention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…To our knowledge, only a few published studies (Gonzalez-Rosa et al, 2006; Paul, Beatty, Schneider, Blanco, & Hames, 1998; Vazquez-Marrufo et al, 2008; Vazquez-Marrufo, et al, 2009) have compared results from MS and control participants using an adaptation of Posner's attention-cueing paradigm. It is interesting that in the subset of those studies that reported reliable group differences in cueing effect magnitudes (Gonzalez-Rosa et al, 2006; Vazquez-Marrufo et al, 2008), smaller cueing effects were found for MS than for control participants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%