2000
DOI: 10.4067/s0716-98682000000100010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potencialidades Y Limitaciones Del Uso De Recursos Multimediales en La Enseñanza De Anatomía Veterinaria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, plastination, 3D-computed tomography images, problembased learning, bodypainting sessions, e-learning, videos, and alternative and supportive Several attempts have been made to improve anatomy teaching within this new paradigm [5,7,8]. For example, plastination, 3D-computed tomography images, problembased learning, bodypainting sessions, e-learning, videos, and alternative and supportive educational tools have all been implemented to suit the current demands [1,6,[9][10][11][12][13]. Since each institution has specific teaching resources and curriculum policies, this can often interfere with new educational strategies; therefore, the introduction of new approaches is often a challenge for educators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, plastination, 3D-computed tomography images, problembased learning, bodypainting sessions, e-learning, videos, and alternative and supportive Several attempts have been made to improve anatomy teaching within this new paradigm [5,7,8]. For example, plastination, 3D-computed tomography images, problembased learning, bodypainting sessions, e-learning, videos, and alternative and supportive educational tools have all been implemented to suit the current demands [1,6,[9][10][11][12][13]. Since each institution has specific teaching resources and curriculum policies, this can often interfere with new educational strategies; therefore, the introduction of new approaches is often a challenge for educators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several attempts have been made to improve anatomy teaching within these new conditions (DiLullo et al, 2006; Plendl et al, 2009; Reidenberg & Laitman, 2002). Alternative and supportive educational tools have all been implemented to suit the current demands, from plastination, 3D‐computed tomography images, and problem‐based learning to bodypainting sessions, e‐learning, and videos (El Sharaby et al, 2015; Galván et al, 2000; Latorre et al, 2007; Senos et al, 2015; Theoret et al, 2007; Yamada et al, 2007). However, there is a paucity of reports assessing those new methods with regards to their efficacy and acceptance by students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generar metodologías de enseñanza apropiadas para la morfología a sido tema de gran interés y han generado discusión en los últimos años, (Galván et al, 2000;Guiraldes et al, 2001;Cabalin et al, 2002;Inzunza et al, 2003;Suazo, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…En el proceso del aprendizaje morfológico, deben usarse todos los métodos disponibles, no sólo como medio para determinar la aprobación de la asignatura, sino, como recurso para motivar y facilitar el proceso de aprendizaje (García-Hernández, 2006). Generar metodologías de enseñanza apropiadas para la morfología a sido tema de gran interés y han generado discusión en los últimos años, (Galván et al, 2000;Guiraldes et al, 2001;Cabalin et al, 2002;Inzunza et al, 2003;Suazo, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified