2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-26290-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential benefits of using radioactive ion beams for range margin reduction in carbon ion therapy

Abstract: Sharp dose gradients and high biological effectiveness make ions such as 12C an ideal tool to treat deep-seated tumors, however, at the same time, sensitive to errors in the range prediction. Tumor safety margins mitigate these uncertainties, but during the irradiation they lead to unavoidable damage to the surrounding healthy tissue. To fully exploit the Bragg peak benefits, a large effort is put into establishing precise range verification methods. Despite positron emission tomography being widely in use for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As already shown in Figure S14, LET d optimization lead to some sort of distal patching and thus, anatomical changes and range uncertainties are expected to cause challenges in terms of robustness. The introduction of other modalities, such as dual energy CT 27 or innovative range uncertainty mitigating approaches (e.g., using radioactive ion beams 28 or exploiting a mixed helium/carbon beam for online monitoring 29 ), could reduce uncertainties in stopping power estimation. This may have a positive impact on increasing the LET d in large tumors by minimizing the range uncertainty considered in robust optimization.The robustness evaluation performed in this study represents a very conservative approach, assessing a worst case scenario of having the same systematic error, in the same direction, repeated in every fraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already shown in Figure S14, LET d optimization lead to some sort of distal patching and thus, anatomical changes and range uncertainties are expected to cause challenges in terms of robustness. The introduction of other modalities, such as dual energy CT 27 or innovative range uncertainty mitigating approaches (e.g., using radioactive ion beams 28 or exploiting a mixed helium/carbon beam for online monitoring 29 ), could reduce uncertainties in stopping power estimation. This may have a positive impact on increasing the LET d in large tumors by minimizing the range uncertainty considered in robust optimization.The robustness evaluation performed in this study represents a very conservative approach, assessing a worst case scenario of having the same systematic error, in the same direction, repeated in every fraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although 10 C would be the ideal isotope among the candidates for a positron-emitting treatment beam in terms of half-life, its low production cross-section makes it challenging to achieve therapeutic intensities through projectile fragmentation. On the other hand, 11 C has a production cross-section roughly one order of magnitude higher, but its half-life is too long to be considered for fast range monitoring using in-beam PET.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, patient anatomical changes may occur during treatment. To address this, margins are typically added to the treated region, which unfortunately causes unnecessary dose deposition to healthy tissue, ultimately leading to increased toxicity 10 . Positron emission tomography (PET) is one of the most commonly employed methods to monitor dose delivery in ion beam therapy 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%