2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential Energy Saving of V2V-Connected Vehicles in Large-Scale Traffic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, an ego vehicle is able to acquire real-time road information from GPS or roadside units (RSUs), such as legal speed limit, road curvature, and slope angle, [38], [39]. The front traffic can be reasonably formulated as a leading vehicle [40], and in the present framework, it is assumed that a speed profile of the leading vehicle is available for the ego vehicle, which can be obtained from the leading vehicle via V2V [41] or from the RSUs via V2I [42] communication. Furthermore, it is assumed that no lane changing or overtaking of the leading vehicle is taking place.…”
Section: Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, an ego vehicle is able to acquire real-time road information from GPS or roadside units (RSUs), such as legal speed limit, road curvature, and slope angle, [38], [39]. The front traffic can be reasonably formulated as a leading vehicle [40], and in the present framework, it is assumed that a speed profile of the leading vehicle is available for the ego vehicle, which can be obtained from the leading vehicle via V2V [41] or from the RSUs via V2I [42] communication. Furthermore, it is assumed that no lane changing or overtaking of the leading vehicle is taking place.…”
Section: Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, an ego vehicle is able to acquire real-time road information from GPS or roadside units (RSUs), such as legal speed limit, road curvature, and slope angle, [34], [35]. The front traffic can be reasonably formulated as a leading vehicle [36], and in the present framework, it is assumed that a speed profile of the leading vehicle is available for the ego vehicle, which can be obtained from the leading vehicle via V2V [37] or from the RSUs via V2I [38] communication. Furthermore, it is assumed that no lane changing or overtaking of the leading vehicle is taking place.…”
Section: Statement Of Eacc Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the prediction of the leading vehicle ṽl (k:k+N−1) available to the ego vehicle is generated by setting ṽl (k:k+N−1)=v l, f (k:k+N−1), ∀k ∈ [0, k s ]) to emulate non-optimal behaviours and inevitable communication or sensing error of the leading vehicle velocity. The resulting velocity error further results in the disturbance on the time gap state, d t , (determined by (37)).…”
Section: A Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, model predictive control (MPC) has been gaining popularity for EV controllers, especially with the advancement of connected and autonomous vehicle (CAV) technology enabled by vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) and vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communications [7], [8]. With these communications, the ego vehicle is aware of the driving environment and the travel plans of other vehicles on the road.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%