2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential for control of harmful cyanobacterial blooms using biologically derived substances: Problems and prospects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
71
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Occurrences of Dolichospermum species and their toxins in large quantities have been documented in numerous water bodies (e.g., Tsujimura and Okubo, 2003;Cook et al, 2004;John and Kemp, 2006;Karjalainen et al, 2007;Kravchuk, 2009;Ciré s et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013;Callieri et al, 2014), and the incidences of public exposure through drinking water or recreational activities have become more serious (e.g., Bowling and Baker, 1996;Al-Tebrineh et al, 2012), making a review on Dolichospermum cyanobacteria timely. Options for controlling or mitigating cyanobacterial blooms and their toxins have been previously summarized (Jia et al, 2010;Ho et al, 2012;Shao et al, 2013;Yang et al, 2013;Lü rling and Tolman, 2014;Steffen et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2014;Zamyadi et al, 2015) and will not be discussed here. In this review, knowledge of waterbloom forming Dolichospermum is summarized, focussing on taxonomy, the status of genomic information that is beginning to facilitate studies on the detailed controls of bloom dynamics, and the potential hazards caused by these blooms and their toxins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occurrences of Dolichospermum species and their toxins in large quantities have been documented in numerous water bodies (e.g., Tsujimura and Okubo, 2003;Cook et al, 2004;John and Kemp, 2006;Karjalainen et al, 2007;Kravchuk, 2009;Ciré s et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013;Callieri et al, 2014), and the incidences of public exposure through drinking water or recreational activities have become more serious (e.g., Bowling and Baker, 1996;Al-Tebrineh et al, 2012), making a review on Dolichospermum cyanobacteria timely. Options for controlling or mitigating cyanobacterial blooms and their toxins have been previously summarized (Jia et al, 2010;Ho et al, 2012;Shao et al, 2013;Yang et al, 2013;Lü rling and Tolman, 2014;Steffen et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2014;Zamyadi et al, 2015) and will not be discussed here. In this review, knowledge of waterbloom forming Dolichospermum is summarized, focussing on taxonomy, the status of genomic information that is beginning to facilitate studies on the detailed controls of bloom dynamics, and the potential hazards caused by these blooms and their toxins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the removal of harmful cyanobacterial blooms is a crucial step for the maintenance of safe water supplies and for the safety of aquatic products [4]. Recent years have seen many studies relating to the isolation and identification of allelochemicals from aquatic plants [5][6][7][8], while the algicidal properties of terrestrial plants still get less attention [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was because sites 1 and 3 had higher turbidity due to the inflow of organic matters from the surrounding areas and rainfalls whereas site 2 had an inflow of stream water from the nearby weir constructed at the upstream, which made faster flow and lower turbidity (diatoms) than other two sites. The growth inhibition or promotion of periphyton such as diatoms has been known to be affected by a flow rate, turbidity, and DO in streams [9], [10]. …”
Section: A Biomass Of the Periphytonmentioning
confidence: 99%