2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential interest of developing an integrated boost dose escalation for stereotactic irradiation of primary prostate cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For plans that involved higher doses prescribed to the boost volume and lower doses prescribed to the rest of the prostate volume, similar or not significantly different doses to OARs were generally reported [12,45,65,68,76,77,123]. For instance, compared with a treatment with the whole-gland dose of 40 Gy in five fractions (homogenous dose escalation to the entire gland), significantly improved protection of the bladder and rectum was reported with focal boost plans that de-escalated the dose to the prostate (35.2 Gy to prostate PTV with 40 Gy to PTV boost in five fractions) [70].…”
Section: Dosimetric Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For plans that involved higher doses prescribed to the boost volume and lower doses prescribed to the rest of the prostate volume, similar or not significantly different doses to OARs were generally reported [12,45,65,68,76,77,123]. For instance, compared with a treatment with the whole-gland dose of 40 Gy in five fractions (homogenous dose escalation to the entire gland), significantly improved protection of the bladder and rectum was reported with focal boost plans that de-escalated the dose to the prostate (35.2 Gy to prostate PTV with 40 Gy to PTV boost in five fractions) [70].…”
Section: Dosimetric Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The longest reported follow-up time was 124 months [49]. In the planning studies, as shown in Table 2, the majority of studies utilized mpMRI for GTV delineation [10,18,45,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75]. Five studies utilized PET-CT [12,[76][77][78][79][80], and four studies used "other methods" such as histopathology data or hypothetical IPLs [81][82][83][84].…”
Section: Statistics Of Reviewed Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the majority of local relapses occur at the site of primary tumor following radiotherapy for prostate cancer ( 54 , 55 ), and to minimize the QOL decrements associated with whole gland boost, the next step would be dose painting with focal boost to the dominant nodule. A planning study by Udrescu et al, demonstrated a significant improvement in the bladder and rectal dosimetry in the MRI based focal boost plan when compared to the whole gland boost ( 56 ). In the study by Aluwini et al, 50 low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients were treated with SABR to a total dose of 38 Gy delivered in four daily fractions and an integrated boost of up to 11 Gy per fraction was applied to the dominant lesion visible on MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%