2018
DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20186702047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential of biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of fat, oil and grease waste and food waste

Abstract: The generation of fat, oil and grease (FOG) waste can be a nuisance hazard, but also a potential for resource recovery. FOG waste can be utilized as nutrient and energy source through anaerobic digestion which may increase methane yield but also increase presence of inhibitors. Using the biochemical methane potential method, this research is aimed to determine the effect of FOG waste in the co-digestion process of food waste (FW) to produce biogas. The research was conducted for 42 days at 37˚C using FOG waste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 8A shows that the methane yield ranged from 396 mL CH 4 /g VSS to 577 mL CH 4 /g VSS and the highest was found in the butter addition 0 g VSS/L. These results were higher than: cow manure with food wastes (butter mixture, palm oil, meat, and margarine ) with a ratio of 1:8 and 208.93 mL CH 4 /g VSS (Sandriaty et al, 2018); lipid waste 1.67 g VSS/L (tuna 7.5 %, butter 22.3%, apple 27%, banana 27 %, chicken breast 7.5%, bread 1.5%, pasta 1.5%, and minestrone soup 5.5%) of 257 mL CH 4 /g VSS; as well as protein waste 1.67 g VSS/L (tuna 31.1%, butter 5.5%, apple 7.85%, banana 7.85%, chicken breast 31.1%, bread 3.2 %, pasta 3.2%, minestrone soup 10.2%) of 350 mL CH 4 /g VSS (Rafieenia et al, 2017). However, these results were lower than in the case of chicken manure with waste activated sludge 1:1 of 880 mL CH 4 /g VSS Budych-Gorzna et al, 2016).…”
Section: Biogas Componentmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 8A shows that the methane yield ranged from 396 mL CH 4 /g VSS to 577 mL CH 4 /g VSS and the highest was found in the butter addition 0 g VSS/L. These results were higher than: cow manure with food wastes (butter mixture, palm oil, meat, and margarine ) with a ratio of 1:8 and 208.93 mL CH 4 /g VSS (Sandriaty et al, 2018); lipid waste 1.67 g VSS/L (tuna 7.5 %, butter 22.3%, apple 27%, banana 27 %, chicken breast 7.5%, bread 1.5%, pasta 1.5%, and minestrone soup 5.5%) of 257 mL CH 4 /g VSS; as well as protein waste 1.67 g VSS/L (tuna 31.1%, butter 5.5%, apple 7.85%, banana 7.85%, chicken breast 31.1%, bread 3.2 %, pasta 3.2%, minestrone soup 10.2%) of 350 mL CH 4 /g VSS (Rafieenia et al, 2017). However, these results were lower than in the case of chicken manure with waste activated sludge 1:1 of 880 mL CH 4 /g VSS Budych-Gorzna et al, 2016).…”
Section: Biogas Componentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, there is a need to determine the mixture of substrates related to fats and AD availability. Fat wastes have been reportedly improved in a ratio of 1:8 digestion of cow manure (Sandriaty et al, 2018). Bacteria (also shock load) usually inhibit methane production (Bundhoo et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sewage, animal manure, etc.) (Chiu and Lo, 2016;Oladejo et al, 2020;Sandriaty et al, 2018). Zhang et al (2014) advised on several pre-treatment options (i.e.…”
Section: Biogasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Da Silva et al [51], combined swine manure with waste cooking oil in a proportion of 45.6 to 66.7 waste cooking oil/kg manure, obtaining better values than just swine manure. Sandriaty et al [52], determined the effect of WCO into co-digestion process of food waste to produce biogas, being the result a methane yield of 485 mL CH4/gr Volatile Solids.…”
Section: Biodegradationmentioning
confidence: 99%