2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2016.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential risks of iatrogenic complications of nerve conduction studies (NCS) and electromyography (EMG)

Abstract: HighlightsRisks associated with NCS and EMG investigations.Review of the published level of complications.Pragmatic recommendations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of these tests in diaphragmatic paralysis is limited due to the many technical challenges of performing these tests, and complexity in their interpretation. They can assist in differentiating neuropathic and myopathic dysfunction [ 59 , 60 ].…”
Section: Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of these tests in diaphragmatic paralysis is limited due to the many technical challenges of performing these tests, and complexity in their interpretation. They can assist in differentiating neuropathic and myopathic dysfunction [ 59 , 60 ].…”
Section: Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although an electrodiagnostic study is considered the most important diagnostic test for cubital tunnel syndrome, it has some critical disadvantages. It is time-consuming, causes pain and injury to patients due to needle insertion and electrical stimulation, provides limited information regarding lesion localization and structural abnormalities, and carries a strong possibility of falsenegative results [5]. Thus, complementary imaging studies such as magnetic resonance or ultrasound imaging are required for the diagnosis of various neuropathies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with any other invasive technique there remains a risk of bleeding, however slight. Previous studies have shown an incidence for bleeding events between 0% and 11%, with a much lower risk for a necessary surgical intervention ( Baba et al, 2005 , Boon et al, 2012 , Butler and Dewan, 1984 , Farrell et al, 2003 , Gechev et al, 2016 , Gertken et al, 2013 , Rosioreanu et al, 2005 , Vaienti et al, 2005 ). In general, the risk of a significant bleed has to be weighed against the risks inherent in postponing or cancelling the EMG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%