2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40262-015-0361-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential Sources of Inter-Subject Variability in Monoclonal Antibody Pharmacokinetics

Abstract: Understanding inter-subject variability in drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics is important to ensure that all patients attain suitable drug exposure to achieve efficacy and avoid toxicity. Inter-subject variability in the pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is generally moderate to high; however, the factors responsible for the high inter-subject variability have not been comprehensively reviewed. In this review, the extent of inter-subject variability for mAb pharmacokinetics … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 169 publications
3
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…BW was a key covariate identified in this analysis for both CL and VC for all screened mAbs used in oncology. Although the effect of BW on the PK of mAbs is well established, we have shown here that both CL and VC increased with an increase in BW, and the magnitude of the effect of BW for respective PK parameters was similar across the majority of mAbs analysed. It is also notable that the magnitude of effect of BW on CL was substantially higher for elotuzumab, rituximab and trastuzumab when compared with other mAbs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…BW was a key covariate identified in this analysis for both CL and VC for all screened mAbs used in oncology. Although the effect of BW on the PK of mAbs is well established, we have shown here that both CL and VC increased with an increase in BW, and the magnitude of the effect of BW for respective PK parameters was similar across the majority of mAbs analysed. It is also notable that the magnitude of effect of BW on CL was substantially higher for elotuzumab, rituximab and trastuzumab when compared with other mAbs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…BW‐based dosing has traditionally been used in the development of therapeutic mAbs, as body size was believed to account for a major source of variability across individuals . This is supported by the argument that larger individuals have a higher volume of distribution due to a greater volume of plasma and interstitial fluid when compared with smaller individuals, and that there is lower linear elimination in smaller compared with larger individuals . Considering that BW has a significant effect on CL and VC, it may seem logical to use BW‐based dosing with mAbs compared with flat dosing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many other factors, such as antibody properties (hydrophobicity, charge, glycosylation patterns), intersubject variability (disease status, body size, genetic polymorphisms, concomitant medication, comorbidities, etc …”
Section: Metabolism/catabolism and Clearance Mechanisms Of Mabsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1-5, [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] The pharmacokinetic variability of mAbs may be explained by several individual factors. The most frequent are: -An increase in volume of distribution and clearance with body size, as measured by body weight, height or fat-free mass); Higher volume of distribution and clearance in male than in female; -An increase in clearance when serum albumin decreases; -A dramatical increase in mAb clearance when anti-drug antibodies are present, leading to low mAb concentrations and hence loss of response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%