2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4549.2001.tb00456.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential Use of 18 Tesla Static and Pulsed Magnetic Fields on Escherichia Coli and Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Abstract: Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae were subjected to 18T static and pulsed magnetic fields at different temperatures in either phosphate buffer, McIlvaine buffer, or peptonated water. Colony forming units were recorded after incubation in nutrient and Violet Red Bile agar for E. coli and potato dextrose agar for S. cerevisiae. No inactivation or cell injury was detected due to the influence of the magnetic field whether static or pulsed. As expected, at higher temperatures both inactivation and cell… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the inactivation efficacy of microorganisms depends on magnetic field process parameters (such as type, intensity, frequency, and duration of action), microorganism properties (such as types, growth phase, and density) ( 28 ). Consequently, the window effect hypothesis has been proposed for the different effects of magnetic field on the growth of microorganisms, that is, specific parameters correspond to specific microorganisms ( 42 , 43 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the inactivation efficacy of microorganisms depends on magnetic field process parameters (such as type, intensity, frequency, and duration of action), microorganism properties (such as types, growth phase, and density) ( 28 ). Consequently, the window effect hypothesis has been proposed for the different effects of magnetic field on the growth of microorganisms, that is, specific parameters correspond to specific microorganisms ( 42 , 43 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it was long hoped to use high magnetic fields to reduce microbial growth for sanitization. However, neither static nor pulsed magnetic fields showed a significant impact on microbial growth (Harte et al, 2001), viability (László and Kutasi, 2010), or endospore germination (Wu et al, 2017). It is still noteworthy that transposition and heat shock protein activity was induced in Escherichia coli cells when exposed to magnetic fields (Chow and Tung, 2000;Potenza et al, 2004;Del Re et al, 2006).…”
Section: General Considerations For In Vivo Magnetization Of Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assim no primeiro enfoque as questões científicas surgem das variáveis físicoquímicas, enzimáticas, microbiológicas, nutricionais e sensoriais do produto (HARTE et al, 2001;FOJT et al, 2004;JANAS;BARABASZ, 2004;FAN, 2007;LIPIEC;NOVÁK et al, 2007;CELLINI et al, 2008;GAO et al, 2008;HAILE et al, 2008;ÇELIK et al, 2009 No segundo enfoque avaliam-se os aspectos do processo nos rendimentos, aceleração de reações, melhora na operabilidade, redução de custos (CANLI et al, 2011;JIN et al, 2015;ZHANG et al, 2015;DAI et al, 2016;JIN et al, 2016a;JIN et al, 2016b;ZHAO et al, 2016).…”
Section: Efeitos Dos Campos Magnéticos Nos Alimentosunclassified