Potentials of Plastic Waste for Making Brickets: The Effect of Composition on Procsimate Analysis

Ningsih, Erlinda; Udyani, Kartika

doi:10.20527/k.v9i2.8824

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 14 publications

(21 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Optimal conditions plastic percent at 24% and 20% adhesive percent. Ningsih and Udyani (2020) reported that charcoal briquettes from plastic bottle waste is in accordance with SNI were under conditions of 40 mesh charcoal particle size, with a water content of 0.5±0.05%, an ash content of 2±0 .25%, volatile content of 15±0.51%, bound carbon content of 82.5±0.32%, and calorific value of 9982.779±240.017 cal/gram.…”

Section: Gasification Processmentioning

confidence: 85%

“…Briquettes are the result of converting coal, organic waste, factory waste and from urban waste into fuel that is more effective, efficient and easy to use (Sawir, 2016). The briquettes produced are then analyzed for the quality of the briquettes using the proximate analysis (Ningsih, 2020).…”

Section: Briquettementioning

confidence: 99%

“…One of the uses of plastic waste that has been carried out by several researchers is plastic waste into briquette making materials, the results obtained are that the addition of plastic to briquettes made from organic waste or agricultural waste can increase the calorific value. The application of plastic into briquettes aims to fulfill energy that is starting to become scarce (Ningsih, 2020). Therefore, the objective of this review is to provide information, ideas as well as evaluation activities of previous research in order to give suggestions for further research on processing plastic waste into briquettes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Review of Recycling Plastic Waste into Briquettes

Nabil¹,

Putri²,

Ariyanti³

et al. 2022

Nat. Sci. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The increasing demand for energy in transportation, industry, and domestic activities around the world is the starting point of the industrial revolution that has an impact on the emergence of environmental problems. The innovation of processing waste into alternative energy sources is an idea that has good potential in overcoming dependence on conventional energy sources. Processing plastic waste into alternative fuels in the form of plastic briquettes, including tertiary recycling. Converting plastic waste into alternative fuels can be done using several variations of methods and variations of adhesive materials. On carbonization only produces one type only. Plastic briquettes (PP) can produce a higher heating value of 9982.779±240.017 cal/gram and 3.90% ash content. From plastic briquettes (PET) 7024.56 cal/gram and 0.27% ash content but also produces a high ash content, this is because there are still impurities in it. Meanwhile, for the type of adhesive with the same composition as briquettes with starch adhesive, the heat value was 6328 kcal/kg, arpus 6366 kcal/kg. Although the calorific value is higher, the arpus adhesive usually tends to produce briquettes with black smoke, this is due to the composition of the arpus which is made from rubber tree sap.

show abstract

Section: Gasification Processmentioning

confidence: 85%

Section: Briquettementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Review of Recycling Plastic Waste into Briquettes

Nabil¹,

Putri²,

Ariyanti³

et al. 2022

Nat. Sci. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For instance, the utilization of plastic waste to produce biobriquettes has resulted in a calorific value of 8565.914 cal/g, a moisture content of 5.47%, and an ash content of 4.95%. These biobriquettes meet Indonesian national standards (Ningsih & Udyani, 2020). Additionally, biobriquettes made from corn cobs have been successfully characterized with a calorific value of 5666 cal/g, moisture content and ash content at 3.67% and 4.83%, respectively.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 87%

Fabrication of Biobriquettes from Mixture of Palm Fronds and Palm Shells with Varying Binders of Tapioca and Sago Flour

Simatupang,

Simbolon

2023

IJARSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Biobriquettes are products obtained from the compaction process of biomass residue used as fuel and formed by using a binding agent. In this study, the biomass used comprised palm fronds and palm shells. The objective was to determine the characteristics of biobriquettes. The research methodology adopted was quantitative experimentation. Results showed that the highest calorific value of biobriquettes was 6729.92 cal/g (1:3-sago 15%), the lowest moisture content was 1.1168% (1:3-tapioca 10%), the lowest ash content was 9.5232% (1:3-sago 10%) and the highest density was 0.9927 g/cm3 (1:3-tapioca 20%). Based on the test results, it can be concluded that the optimal ratio of raw materials palm fronds to palm kernel shells for biobriquette fabrication is 1:3 with 10% tapioca flour and 10-15% sago flour as binders.

show abstract

“…The materials were then dried at 105ºC for 24 h in an oven. This process was conducted to eliminate moisture content thus preventing rotting [3]. The analysis of lignocellulose content, proximate and calorific value of the raw material was conducted.…”

Section: Pre-treatment Of Raw Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Characterization and Comparative Study of Pyrolysis of Low Rank Coal and Biomass

Jelita,

Nata,

Irawan

et al. 2024

JCTM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Low rank coals are not used optimally, another way to increase this value is combustion without oxygen, known as pyrolysis. On the other hand, as a solid waste biomass, palm kernel shell (PKS) is a by-product of the palm oil industry that can cause environmental problems if not handled properly. In fact, the waste is plentiful and not even widely used, therefore it may also be an ideal feedstock for the pyrolysis process. This study compares the distribution of products from coal and PKS pyrolysis, and also characterizes the liquid (tar) and solid (char) products. The results show that the pyrolysis of coal produces more char, while the pyrolysis of PKS produces more gas. Higher tar yields were obtained with the pyrolysis process using PKS. GC-MS identified the main tar compounds for both materials as phenol and acetic acid, 3-methylphenol and methanol were also found in coal and PKS, respectively. The calorific value of char increased by about 5.19 % for coal and 41.12 % for PKS after pyrolysis. The other physical properties of coal and PKS are also improved after pyrolysis. Therefore, the application of pyrolysis in the use of coal and PKS can increase the added value of these two materials and contribute to alternative energy sources.

show abstract

Potentials of Plastic Waste for Making Brickets: The Effect of Composition on Procsimate Analysis

Cited by 3 publications

References 14 publications

Review of Recycling Plastic Waste into Briquettes

Review of Recycling Plastic Waste into Briquettes

Fabrication of Biobriquettes from Mixture of Palm Fronds and Palm Shells with Varying Binders of Tapioca and Sago Flour

Characterization and Comparative Study of Pyrolysis of Low Rank Coal and Biomass

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About