2018
DOI: 10.1080/1177083x.2018.1538053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potentials, problems and possibilities for developing New Zealand’s built environment through high-value geospatial information

Abstract: Gaining useful information about our built, social and natural environments is vital and possible. The value of data for cities is more informed, more effective management and development choices resulting in more benefits to a greater range of stakeholders. This article explores the state-of-play of data infrastructures in New Zealand to identify the challenges to gaining better value from geospatial information. Following engagement with built environment data custodians and information users, it analyses ho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once the risk factors are identified from literature, common risk factors are categorised according to their source and influence. The technical BIM risk categories that were identified are the most recurrent in recent literature and are in line with recent studies such as Zhao et al (2017), Singh et al (2017), Ivory et al (2019), Ayinla and Adamu (2018) and Guo et al (2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once the risk factors are identified from literature, common risk factors are categorised according to their source and influence. The technical BIM risk categories that were identified are the most recurrent in recent literature and are in line with recent studies such as Zhao et al (2017), Singh et al (2017), Ivory et al (2019), Ayinla and Adamu (2018) and Guo et al (2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Furthermore, it is argued that there is a need to use data between different BIM applications smoothly and avoid unnecessary data re-entry downstream while ensuring data integrity (Gholami et al , 2015; Jiao et al , 2013; Howard and Bjork, 2008; Fox and Hietanen, 2007). Furthermore, Ivory et al (2019) stressed the security barriers of dealing with data and its impediment of information use based on the sensitivity of such data. In current practice, there are divergences in the capability between BIM software.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solving the architectural and technical issues is only part of the SKI implementation challenge. The issues of policy and governance are equally very difficult to solve-the research in this domain is emerging, with a few first challenges described in detail in Ivory, O'Donnell, and Schindler (2019).…”
Section: Con Clus I On S and Future Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%