2012
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2012.2200705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power Allocation for Multiuser Cooperative Communication Networks Under Relay-Selection Degree Bounds

Abstract: This paper considers the joint power-allocation and relay-selection problems in multiuser cooperative communication networks, where one user can only seek a limited number of relays for cooperation. This relay-selection degree bound is of practical significance. The goal is to optimize the relay selection and power allocation in a distributed manner while respecting certain users' quality-of-service (QoS) requirements. This problem is challenging due to its combinatorial nature, even from a centralized perspec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, h nm and ℓ nm typically remain unchanged over a block of transmitted/relaying signals, i.e., block fading. On the other hand, x x x nm = 0 means that relay n is disconnected from both user m and destination m. To control how the N relays are used to help M source-destination pairs, the number of relays assigned to each user shall be limited to at most N R [26], [29]:…”
Section: Joint Beamforming and Relay Selection With Orthogonal Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, h nm and ℓ nm typically remain unchanged over a block of transmitted/relaying signals, i.e., block fading. On the other hand, x x x nm = 0 means that relay n is disconnected from both user m and destination m. To control how the N relays are used to help M source-destination pairs, the number of relays assigned to each user shall be limited to at most N R [26], [29]:…”
Section: Joint Beamforming and Relay Selection With Orthogonal Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, joint power allocation and relay assignment problems in orthogonal multi-user scenarios have recently been considered in [25]- [29], either under a game-theoretical framework or by adopting a maximum-ratiocombining receiver. By relaxing the binary constraints {0, 1} of relay assignment to a box constraint on [0, 1], the optimization problems in these papers become convex programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 So far, the power allocation issue has been widely investigated. [15][16][17][18][19] For instance, in the work of Nasri et al, 15 power allocation was studied in consideration of single-source, single-destination cooperative communication systems. Intuitively speaking, the function of power allocation can be formulated quite naturally in multisource cooperative communication systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuitively speaking, the function of power allocation can be formulated quite naturally in multisource cooperative communication systems. In the work of Fang et al, 16 a joint power allocation and relay selection strategy has been studied in multisource cooperative communication networks, where a distributed power allocation algorithm is proposed based on a time-reversible Markov chain. Furthermore, in the work of Tong et al, 17 power allocation for multihop cooperative communication networks comprising multiple relays has been studied by considering the cooperative AF scheme, which is designed for minimizing the bit error rate and maximizing the sum data rate simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and environmental pollution have increased enormously [2,3] in smart city communication. The aforementioned issues have attracted the attention of researchers to develop efficient solutions for energy-saving and power control [4][5][6]. Two relay schemes, namely, (i) amplify-and-forward (AF) and (ii) decode-and-forward (DF), have attained significant attentions as the most typical relaying protocols [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%