In this article, the discourse of 12 women superintendents is examined with the expressed aim of determining if patterns in their talk about their superintendency experiences contain events or episodes of inequality. The study's examination is guided by an adaptation of Swindler's theory of "settled" and "unsettled" social periods. Qualitative inquiry and analysis methods are used to identify emerging themes or topics of talk. Five topics of talk emerge from the narrative data: power, silence, style, responsibility, and people. Each of these topics is examined for settled and unsettled properties and further analyzed using the lenses of Chase and Bell's identified strategies to discover how the women treat their experiences of inequality in their discourse.With a foundation laid by Patricia Schmuck, Flora Ida Ortiz, Charol Shakeshaft, and others, a previously neglected area of study-women in educational administration-began to take shape, and questions about the dearth of women in administration were asked. Even with this new foundation, however, research focused on women superintendents was and is as scarce and scattered as the women themselves. To be sure, after approximately 75 years of extant scholarship on the superintendency that relied primarily on White, male participants, it is only during the past 20 years that one finds research directed specifically to women superintendents (Tallerico, 1999, p. 29).Certainly, when women find themselves in the position of superintendent of schools, it is immediately apparent to them that of their colleagues the greatest number are men. In fact, during this 1999-2000 school year, approximately 13% of superintendents are women (Glass, Björk, & Brunner, 2000). Furthermore, it is shocking to see that when a line graph is constructed using the percentages of women in the superintendency from each year over the 76