2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.01.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power and syngas production from partial oxidation of fuel-rich methane/DME mixtures in an HCCI engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…us, the methanol reactor temperature of 213°C in the indirect process is the optimum temperature where there is a balance between kinetic and thermodynamic constraints [45]. e same trend is also reported by Ountaksinkul et al at reactor pressure of 50 bar, where the methanol production increased in the range of 200 to 255°C due to enhancement of reaction rate of CO 2 hydrogenation (see (2)) and then decreased with increasing the temperature due to thermodynamic equilibrium of endothermic reaction (see (4)) [42]. ere are three curves in the methanol production in the direct process: in the temperature range of 195°C to 204°C, there is an increase in methanol production due to kinetics preference of methanol formation reaction (see (2)); in the temperature range of 204°C to 276°C, there is a decrease in methanol production due to thermodynamic limitation of methanol formation reaction (see (2)) [34,42] and conversion to DME (see (1)); and in the temperature range of 267°C to 366°C, the methanol production is relatively constant at this temperature region due to the equilibrium between kinetic preference and thermodynamic limitation [30].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…us, the methanol reactor temperature of 213°C in the indirect process is the optimum temperature where there is a balance between kinetic and thermodynamic constraints [45]. e same trend is also reported by Ountaksinkul et al at reactor pressure of 50 bar, where the methanol production increased in the range of 200 to 255°C due to enhancement of reaction rate of CO 2 hydrogenation (see (2)) and then decreased with increasing the temperature due to thermodynamic equilibrium of endothermic reaction (see (4)) [42]. ere are three curves in the methanol production in the direct process: in the temperature range of 195°C to 204°C, there is an increase in methanol production due to kinetics preference of methanol formation reaction (see (2)); in the temperature range of 204°C to 276°C, there is a decrease in methanol production due to thermodynamic limitation of methanol formation reaction (see (2)) [34,42] and conversion to DME (see (1)); and in the temperature range of 267°C to 366°C, the methanol production is relatively constant at this temperature region due to the equilibrium between kinetic preference and thermodynamic limitation [30].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Afterward, the CO 2 conversion decreases up to 366°C due to thermodynamic equilibrium limitation at higher temperatures [43,44]. Meanwhile, CO 2 conversion in the direct process increases from temperatures of 195°C, reaching a maximum value of 0.13. e increase is due to the kinetic preference of methanol formation (see (2)) and DME formation (see (1)) by consuming methanol formed. Afterward, the conversion is slightly decreased until 366°C where in this range of temperatures the methanol production is slightly increased, while the DME production is slightly decreased.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[28] There is a variety of other recent literature showing methane partial oxidation to methanol, syngas, or other products. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] Our work on the partial oxidation of methane has focused on the search for processes efficient under less acidic environments, in particular trifluoroacetic acid (TFAH). [44] For instance, we have characterized a number of rhodium complexes with C-H activation ability in TFAH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%