2016
DOI: 10.1080/00927872.2015.1087007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power-Central Elements in Tensor Products of Symbol Algebras

Abstract: Let A be a central simple algebra over a field F . Let k1, . . . , kr be cyclic extensions of F such that k1 ⊗F · · · ⊗F kr is a field. We investigate conditions under which A is a tensor product of symbol algebras where each ki is in a symbol F -algebra factor of the same degree as ki. As an application, we give an example of an indecomposable algebra of degree 8 and exponent 2 over a field of 2-cohomological dimension 4.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As I = I ⊥ , we have = 0. We also have dim F eA = dim F (λ+u)A = 1 2 dim F A, hence e is a metabolic idempotent. Since (λ + u)A = eA, there exist x, y ∈ A such that λ + u = ex and e = (λ + u)y. Multiplying the first equality on the left by e, we get e(λ + u) = e 2 x = ex = λ + u.…”
Section: Applications To Square-central Elementsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As I = I ⊥ , we have = 0. We also have dim F eA = dim F (λ+u)A = 1 2 dim F A, hence e is a metabolic idempotent. Since (λ + u)A = eA, there exist x, y ∈ A such that λ + u = ex and e = (λ + u)y. Multiplying the first equality on the left by e, we get e(λ + u) = e 2 x = ex = λ + u.…”
Section: Applications To Square-central Elementsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since D K is of index 4, the index of A K is also 4. So A contains a subfield isomorphic to K. A result of Merkurjev shows that there is no quaternion subalgebra of A containing K, see [11,Cor. 4.5] for char(F) 2.…”
Section: Since Trmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof of Theorem 5.4. The result follows from the computation of f 3 (σ) in Proposition 2.7 and the computation of f 3 (U ) in (3). We use the same notation as in Definition 3.6, and we let h i be a rank 2 skew-hermitian form over (Q, ) such that Ad hi ≃ (Q i , ) ⊗ (H i , ) and σ = ad h1⊥h2⊥h3 .…”
Section: Quadratic Splitting and The F 3 Invariantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of algebras C for which condition (b) of Lemma 5.12 does not hold include indecomposable division algebras of degree 8 and exponent 2; other examples are given in [3]. Note that condition (b) is weaker than [C] ∈ Dec(M/k); it is in fact strictly weaker: see Remark 5.14.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%