1989
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.62.426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power Dependence of Electron-Cyclotron Current Drive for Low- and High-Field Absorption in Tokamaks

Abstract: A new relativistic, bounce-averaged Fokker-Planck-quasilinear code shows that for experimentally relevant rf power /7 r f(W/cm 3 )/[« e (10 13 cm _3 )] 2^0 .5, electron-cyclotron current-drive efficiency (and absorptivity) is power dependent; at given plasma radius the current-drive efficiency increases above linear values for absorption of the rf on the low-field side of the cyclotron resonance layer, but decreases and even passes through zero for absorption on the high-field side. Thus, electron-cyclotron c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
68
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
68
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of linear absorption and adjoint determination of the CD efficiency offers a well-benchmarked, reliable tool for the investigation of the CD efficiency. The broad absorption profiles typical of high-CD injection geometries result generally in relatively low power densities, ruling out quasi-linear effects [48] even for an injected power of several hundred MW (except possibly for the very centre of the plasma column, which is however usually not affected by the peak EC deposition in our simulations). An evaluation of synchrotron losses on the CD efficiency [49] is still to be addressed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The combination of linear absorption and adjoint determination of the CD efficiency offers a well-benchmarked, reliable tool for the investigation of the CD efficiency. The broad absorption profiles typical of high-CD injection geometries result generally in relatively low power densities, ruling out quasi-linear effects [48] even for an injected power of several hundred MW (except possibly for the very centre of the plasma column, which is however usually not affected by the peak EC deposition in our simulations). An evaluation of synchrotron losses on the CD efficiency [49] is still to be addressed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The threshold for quasilinear effects was found by Harvey [28] to be when 2q e /n 19 2 > 1, where q e is the power density in MW /m 3 and n 19 is the density in units of 10 19 m "3 . For this standard density case, this criterion is only 4 "10 #4 for the benchmark calculation at a power level of 1 MW; even at 20 MW this criterion is well satisfied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "standard" analysis is usually based on the solution of either the equations of standard geometrical optics or of extended-ray / paraxial-beam-tracing equations as far as the propagation is concerned, while absorption and current drive calculations are based on linear or quasilinear modelling [31]. In ITER, quasilinear distortions of the electron distribution function are usually found to be very small (consistently with the smallness of the Harvey parameter [32] for standard injection scenarios). Adjoint modelling of current drive including momentum-conserving corrections [33,34], as implemented by now in several codes, also matches well Fokker-Planck results [35].…”
Section: Effects Leading To Broader Deposition Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%