2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cdt.2019.0082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power efficient error correction coding for on‐chip interconnection links

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Velayudham et al [20] a self-calibrated error correction code was introduced which can correct all single-bit random and up to five bits of burst error imparting probability of 100% error correction along with prevention of crosstalk. The code was equipped with standard triple error correction methods and also employed facility of single and double error detection by using extended hamming code defined as (22,16).…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Velayudham et al [20] a self-calibrated error correction code was introduced which can correct all single-bit random and up to five bits of burst error imparting probability of 100% error correction along with prevention of crosstalk. The code was equipped with standard triple error correction methods and also employed facility of single and double error detection by using extended hamming code defined as (22,16).…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of estimated circuits are designed to allow for a trade-off between power consumption and accuracy and energy; however, optimizing one would place limitations on the other [19]. According to [20] Error correction and detection were not performed at various stages of the communication stack. Similarly, in [21,23] the coding scheme was ineffective because of its error-correcting capabilities and presence of crosstalk.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%