2003
DOI: 10.1186/1476-072x-2-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power evaluation of disease clustering tests

Abstract: BackgroundMany different test statistics have been proposed to test for spatial clustering. Some of these statistics have been widely used in various applications. In this paper, we use an existing collection of 1,220,000 simulated benchmark data, generated under 51 different clustering models, to compare the statistical power of several disease clustering tests. These tests are Besag-Newell's R, Cuzick-Edwards' k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN), the spatial scan statistic, Tango's Maximized Excess Events Test (MEET)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in our analysis, these factors showed neither an important effect size coefficient nor a statistically significant association with seropositivity in dogs. The study village is considered a rural town, but the distribution of households does not follow the typical scattered pattern of other rural areas (Song and Kulldorff, 2003). The houses in the study village have an area of 300m 2 on average and are in close proximity to each other, grouped into blocks that are arranged similarly to urban blocks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in our analysis, these factors showed neither an important effect size coefficient nor a statistically significant association with seropositivity in dogs. The study village is considered a rural town, but the distribution of households does not follow the typical scattered pattern of other rural areas (Song and Kulldorff, 2003). The houses in the study village have an area of 300m 2 on average and are in close proximity to each other, grouped into blocks that are arranged similarly to urban blocks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although R scale is a global measure for the spread or dispersion of disease incidence for point data based on nearest neighbor distance (Eck and Weisburd 1995; Krebs 1989; Taylor 1977), Moran’s coefficient measures local spatial autocorrelation for area data (Getis and Ord 1992; Sawada 2001). A comparison of the power evaluation of disease clustering tests has been described by Song and Kulldorff (2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent power evaluations, the scan statistic performed well with a single circular cluster [2,14,15] but underperformed with multiple and non-circular clusters [16]. When applied to case-control data, aside from stratified analyses, the scan statistic cannot be adjusted for covariates [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%