2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-0615(01)00075-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power generation expansion planning with environmental consideration for Lebanon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electric generating capacity planning is obviously an essential approach to deal with this issue. The traditional aim of an electric power utility has focused on providing an adequate supply of electric energy at minimum cost (Karaki et al 2002). In fact, such a planning decision is considerably complicated as it is not only involving a large number of social, economic, political and technical factors and their interactions, but also coupled with complex temporal and spatial variabilities (Lin and Huang 2009b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electric generating capacity planning is obviously an essential approach to deal with this issue. The traditional aim of an electric power utility has focused on providing an adequate supply of electric energy at minimum cost (Karaki et al 2002). In fact, such a planning decision is considerably complicated as it is not only involving a large number of social, economic, political and technical factors and their interactions, but also coupled with complex temporal and spatial variabilities (Lin and Huang 2009b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes Chedid et al (2001a), Karaki et al (2002), andUNDP (2003). In general, these studies tend to overlook the backup sector's emissions and its growing importance.…”
Section: Electric-power Sector Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying principle of the IRP approach is that utilities should provide an energy service to their customers at minimal societal cost. This implies that utilities should consider both supply-and demand-side options when performing their planning operations, and should sometimes take environmental costs into consideration [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Minimal societal costs are defined as the minimum of the joint expenses of the utility and the consumers, which can be represented by the total resource cost or societal cost if environmental externalities are taken into account.…”
Section: Avoided Cost Of Utility By Load Management Programmentioning
confidence: 99%