Power law breakthrough curve tailing in a fracture: The role of advection

Abstract

Keywords:Solute transport Single fracture Breakthrough curve Powerlaw tailing s u m m a r yWe offer an explanation of the strongly tailed solute breakthrough curve typically observed when a tracer test is conducted in fractured bedrock. In this example, we limit the model to a single planar fracture of varying aperture. Flow heterogeneity derives from variable fracture aperture, which implies variable transmissivity (T). The analysis employs a physically based model well-suited to strong heterogeneity and relies only upon advective transport. The purely advective model is able to explain a power-law trend of magnitude À2 to À3 in the breakthrough curve tail; a range that has been found in field tracer experiments. The principle cause of this trend is the comparatively slow transport in zones of small transmissivity (tight aperture). Slow advection occurs when either heterogeneity (variance of ln T) is strong or when the assumed heterogeneity distribution is non-Gaussian. Thus, we link breakthrough tailing to the statistical parameters for the transmissivity field.

Transport of Nitrogen Compounds through Subsoils in Agricultural Areas: Column Tests

“…The values of P e (from 2.47 for UDS2 to 15.04 for the sand sample) suggested that advection was the dominant transport process for contaminants through the UDS1 and sand samples and that dispersion dominated over advection in the case of UDS2 [37]. The significantly different P e for UDS2 likely resulted from stratification and the heterogeneity of the sample.…”

Linking Structural and Transport Properties in Three‐Dimensional Fracture Networks

“…Geological structures significantly influence hydrodynamic flows in low-permeability fractured media. Within an isolated fracture, the nonuniform resistance offered by uneven fracture walls leads to irregularities in the flow, the magnitude of which depends on the roughness in the fracture's aperture (Cardenas et al, 2007;de Dreuzy et al, 2012;Fiori & Becker, 2015;Johnson et al, 2006;Kang et al, 2016;Keller et al, 1999Keller et al, , 1995 and the Reynolds number of the flow (Cardenas et al, 2009;Zou et al, 2017). In a fracture network, larger features can play a more dominant role than in-fracture aperture variability in determining the structure of the fluid velocity field (Bisdom et al, 2016;de Dreuzy et al, 2012;Karra et al, 2015;Makedonska et al, 2016).…”

Application of Tempered-Stable Time Fractional-Derivative Model to Upscale Subdiffusion for Pollutant Transport in Field-Scale Discrete Fracture Networks

“…Each scenario represented the ensemble average of 100 total individual DFN flow and transport realizations. Fracture locations, orientations, lengths, and hydraulic conductivities were generated from predefined distributions obtained in literature [32,48]:…”