2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power outage prediction for natural hazards using synthetic power distribution systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The power system model we use here, though physics-based, cannot resolve all details during a power outage and recovery process. Given that distribution networks and protective devices data are generally not available, star-like network 35 and minimal spanning tree (MST) 73 models (and models combining these two 73 , 74 ) are usually used to generate synthetic distribution networks, and features that may have minor effects on predicting the daily-scale power outage and recovery under hurricanes including protective devices are usually neglected 73 – 75 . Based on these assumptions, the adopted simulation framework is arguably the best model that we can use to capture the power outage and recovery process at a mesoscale level, e.g., for each zip code or census tract, rather than at the individual household level, for risk and resilience analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The power system model we use here, though physics-based, cannot resolve all details during a power outage and recovery process. Given that distribution networks and protective devices data are generally not available, star-like network 35 and minimal spanning tree (MST) 73 models (and models combining these two 73 , 74 ) are usually used to generate synthetic distribution networks, and features that may have minor effects on predicting the daily-scale power outage and recovery under hurricanes including protective devices are usually neglected 73 – 75 . Based on these assumptions, the adopted simulation framework is arguably the best model that we can use to capture the power outage and recovery process at a mesoscale level, e.g., for each zip code or census tract, rather than at the individual household level, for risk and resilience analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large EWO are less frequent and therefore short-term comparison (as in Table 1) gives only partial information about the long term effect of EWO relative to NWO. The majority of outage forecasting models in literature have focused on EWO [14,16,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] while neglecting the impact of NWO whose long-term cumulative effects are substantial. There have been a few NWO studies that have focused on subsets of these outages, such as animal and vegetation related outages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some studies that have focused on power outage prediction during normal weather condition [16][17][18], which are not applicable under windstorms. To address this concern, a variety of methods have been proposed in the past-published studies to predict the storm-caused outages, which can be broadly classified into two main categories: 1fragility-based approaches 2-statistical models [19]. In the first category, reference [19] estimates power outages during disasters based on fragility curves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this concern, a variety of methods have been proposed in the past-published studies to predict the storm-caused outages, which can be broadly classified into two main categories: 1fragility-based approaches 2-statistical models [19]. In the first category, reference [19] estimates power outages during disasters based on fragility curves. In the second category, [20] develops an outage-forecasting model based on the random forest method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%