Power-Posing Robots: The Influence of a Humanoid Robot’s Posture and Size on its Perceived Dominance, Competence, Eeriness, and Threat

Abstract

When interacting with sophisticated digital technologies, people often fall back on the same interaction scripts they apply to the communication with other humans—especially if the technology in question provides strong anthropomorphic cues (e.g., a human-like embodiment). Accordingly, research indicates that observers tend to interpret the body language of social robots in the same way as they would with another human being. Backed by initial evidence, we assumed that a humanoid robot will be considered as more dominant and competent, but also as more eerie and threatening once it strikes a so-called power pose. Moreover, we pursued the research question whether these effects might be accentuated by the robot’s body size. To this end, the current study presented 204 participants with pictures of the robot NAO in different poses (expansive vs. constrictive), while also manipulating its height (child-sized vs. adult-sized). Our results show that NAO’s posture indeed exerted strong effects on perceptions of dominance and competence. Conversely, participants’ threat and eeriness ratings remained statistically independent of the robot’s depicted body language. Further, we found that the machine’s size did not affect any of the measured interpersonal perceptions in a notable way. The study findings are discussed considering limitations and future research directions.

More than a barrier: Nostalgia inhibits, but also promotes, favorable responses to innovative technology.

“…One pertained to human factors, such as self-efficacy in operating machines (Latikka et al, 2019) and user personality traits, with extraversion being linked to favorable attitudes and neuroticism to unfavorable ones (Damholdt et al, 2015). The other direction pertained to technological features, including robots’ appearance (Mori, 1970), postures (Stein et al, 2022), and perceived mind (attributing to robots mental status such as the capacity to feel; Dang & Liu, 2021). In our research, we emphasized sociality.…”

Human behavior and comfort during load carrying to autonomous mobile robot

“…6A and 6B), a much heavier package would likely affect the experiment outcome. Third, we did not employ various AMR parameters, such as size and appearance [22,37,79], acceleration [76], sound [67], and moving and approaching directions [38,80]. Rubagotti et al noted that these factors have been extensively shown to affect perceived safety and comfort [27].…”

Remote patient monitoring using artificial intelligence: Current state, applications, and challenges

“…Taking advantage of the sequential decision‐making ability of reinforcement learning, healthcare applications such as dynamic treatment regimens and Just‐in‐Time‐Adaptive‐Interventions (JITAIs) can be further enhanced. However, there have been recent incidents of deploying physical robots causing threats to humans (Stein et al, 2022). It is recommended to build virtual robots using reinforcement learning agents to monitor patients and predict unprecedented events.…”