2021
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2020.3047510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power System Frequency Security Index Considering All Aspects of Frequency Profile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the more renewable generations connecting to AC power systems, finding the relationship between frequency security boundaries and dominant frequency stability problems is a key topic for power system planning and operation [20]. Dynamic frequency security assessments are concentrated on three indicators: the rate of the change of frequency (f RoCoF ), the frequency nadir (f N ) and the steady-state frequency (f ss ) [21]. When the over-response of wind turbines causes a SFD problem, the frequency recovery process deteriorates further, and there is no specific principle for assessing the SFD [22].…”
Section: The Research On System Frequency Security Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the more renewable generations connecting to AC power systems, finding the relationship between frequency security boundaries and dominant frequency stability problems is a key topic for power system planning and operation [20]. Dynamic frequency security assessments are concentrated on three indicators: the rate of the change of frequency (f RoCoF ), the frequency nadir (f N ) and the steady-state frequency (f ss ) [21]. When the over-response of wind turbines causes a SFD problem, the frequency recovery process deteriorates further, and there is no specific principle for assessing the SFD [22].…”
Section: The Research On System Frequency Security Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, as illustrated in Table 3, three transient frequency characteristics (Delkhosh and Seifi, 2021;Xiong et al, 2021) (i.e., FFD, SFD, and tertiary frequency drop (TFD)) are used here to further concretely quantify and compare the control performance of three designed approaches. Among which the optimal value is highlighted in bold.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the previous studies paid attention to safety margins. Delkhosh and Seifi [ 48 ] proposed an FSI considering all frequency key characteristics. Due to the decline in power system inertia, this paper combines the center-of-inertia frequency (COIF) and FSI to divide the system frequency responses into three categories, i.e., insecurity, relative security, and absolute security.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%