2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2016.7842158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power Talk for Multibus DC MicroGrids: Creating and Optimizing Communication Channels

Abstract: We study a communication framework for nonlinear multibus DC MicroGrids based on a deliberate modification of the parameters of the primary control and termed power talk. We assess the case in which the information is modulated in the deviations of reference voltages of the primary control loops and show that the outputs of the power talk communication channels can be approximated through linear combinations of the respective inputs. We show that the coefficients of the linear combinations, representing equiva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model above defines the input-output relation of a real, linear, synchronous communication channel with channel vector given by the gradient h n (evaluated at the nominal droop values) which contains the real coefficients of the equivalent linear channels that controller n sees to the other controllers; in localized and strongly connected MGs, the entries in h n do not differ significantly (see also [33]), i.e., the channel ( 18) experiences strong all-to-all property.…”
Section: Training Phases and Sub-phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model above defines the input-output relation of a real, linear, synchronous communication channel with channel vector given by the gradient h n (evaluated at the nominal droop values) which contains the real coefficients of the equivalent linear channels that controller n sees to the other controllers; in localized and strongly connected MGs, the entries in h n do not differ significantly (see also [33]), i.e., the channel ( 18) experiences strong all-to-all property.…”
Section: Training Phases and Sub-phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scheme suits well channels with strong all-to-all property, i.e., channels where the gains in h k do not differ significantly; this is the case for small and localized MGs. As the system grows in size and scope, the all-to-all property ceases to be valid and one should consider applying more sophisticated digital modulation/demodulation and scheduling schemes, including error protection coding; see[32],[33] for alternatives.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%