2017 10th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design (ISCID) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iscid.2017.165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power Transformer Fault Diagnosis Using Support Vector Machine and Particle Swarm Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to overcome the difficulties posed by traditional methods in interpreting test results, a major effort has been made to develop intelligent diagnosis in this area. For this purpose, several methods have used artificial intelligence (AI) including expert system (EPS) [10], artificial neural network (ANN) [11], fuzzy logic theory [12], rough sets theory (RST) [13], grey system theory (GST) [14], swarm intelligence (SI) algorithms [15], data mining technology [16], Selforganizing map (SOM) [17], machine learning (ML) [18] and optimized machine learning (OML) [19], to the diagnosis of transformer faults based on DGA data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome the difficulties posed by traditional methods in interpreting test results, a major effort has been made to develop intelligent diagnosis in this area. For this purpose, several methods have used artificial intelligence (AI) including expert system (EPS) [10], artificial neural network (ANN) [11], fuzzy logic theory [12], rough sets theory (RST) [13], grey system theory (GST) [14], swarm intelligence (SI) algorithms [15], data mining technology [16], Selforganizing map (SOM) [17], machine learning (ML) [18] and optimized machine learning (OML) [19], to the diagnosis of transformer faults based on DGA data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome the difficulties posed by traditional methods in interpreting test results, a major effort has been made to develop intelligent diagnosis in this area. For this purpose, several methods have used artificial intelligence (AI) including expert system (EPS) [20], artificial neural network (ANN) [21][22][23], genetic algorithm (GA) [24], fuzzy logic theory [25][26][27], rough sets theory (RST) [28], Grey system theory (GST) [29], swarm intelligence (SI) algorithms [30,31], data mining technology [32], self-organizing map (SOM) [33] and machine learning (ML) [34][35][36] for the diagnosis of transformer faults based on DGA data. The current existing conventional and intelligent methods are carried out by means of a sample dataset with the corresponding labelled faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 The quantitative method can be roughly divided into statistical analysis-based and nonstatistical analysis-based methods. 11 The former is mainly composed of principal component analysis (PCA), 12,13 partial least squares (PLS), 14,15 independent component analysis (ICA), 16,17 analytic hierarchy process, statistical pattern classifiers, 18 reliability analysis, 19 and the most recently developed support vector machine (SVM), [20][21][22] whereas the latter includes complex network, [23][24][25][26] fuzzy logic, [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] information fusion, 38,39 evidential reasoning, [40][41][42][43][44] and multiple decision making. [45][46][47][48][49] The notion of intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS) can be viewed as a natural generalization of usual fuzzy set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%