2011
DOI: 10.1109/jstqe.2010.2074187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power Trends in Communication Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
125
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we also provided an analytical model to estimate, using a top-down approach, the power consumption across the various layers, such as IP switches, optical switches and transponders. This model is in-line with two earlier proposed models [3], [1], with the latter being referred to as a transactional model. In this paper, we want to use the general form of our analytical model to survey a number of power saving approaches for backbone networks.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, we also provided an analytical model to estimate, using a top-down approach, the power consumption across the various layers, such as IP switches, optical switches and transponders. This model is in-line with two earlier proposed models [3], [1], with the latter being referred to as a transactional model. In this paper, we want to use the general form of our analytical model to survey a number of power saving approaches for backbone networks.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…While this growth is gradually slowing down from an earlier Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 100% (about 10 years ago) to an estimated CAGR of 32% currently, this reduced growth still outperforms the annual 10% efficiency increase of telecommunication equipment in the backbone [1], [2]. As such, the power consumed by Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) backbone network devices continues to increase year by year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, a bottom-up approach can be used, as was done by the authors in [8,9]. They summed the power consumption of individual network components (such as routers, optical amplification systems and mobile base stations) to estimate the electricity consumption, per user or per unit of traffic, for a given service.…”
Section: Telecom Operator Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the deviation in the office subcategory from our results is only 30%, which is lower than what we observed for Malmodin's study. This is because the SMARTer2020 report assumed 4 watts for network equipment per office PC, or half of Malmodin's value 8 . While 4 W/unit is slightly lower than our 4.4 W/unit for 2011, the higher number of office PCs in the SMARTer2020 report results in an overall higher value for office network electricity consumption.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation