Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Aided Design (ICCAD)
DOI: 10.1109/iccad.1995.480157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power vs. delay in gate sizing: conflicting objectives?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this representation the delay of the gate (i) is evaluated from tllL,LH (i)= A'tIN + tllLS,LHS (i)(l-Cor») (1) where 'tIN is the input control ramp duration, tHL,LHS the fall or rise step response of the switching gate, Cor a correcting term associated to the carrier speed saturation induced non linear variation of submicron process and A, a process dependent constant term [16].…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this representation the delay of the gate (i) is evaluated from tllL,LH (i)= A'tIN + tllLS,LHS (i)(l-Cor») (1) where 'tIN is the input control ramp duration, tHL,LHS the fall or rise step response of the switching gate, Cor a correcting term associated to the carrier speed saturation induced non linear variation of submicron process and A, a process dependent constant term [16].…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Great interest [1][2][3][4] has been given to the research of optimal solutions to the problem of transistor sizing under delay constraint. But very few information is available on the direct determination of bounds on delay [5] allowing to evaluate the feasibility of constraints and/or the efficiency of an implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great effort has been developed to find optimal solutions to the problem of transistor sizing under delay constraint using global or local optimization heuristics [1][2][3][4] . But few information is available on direct determination of bounds on delay 5,6 allowing to evaluate the feasibility of constraints or the efficiency of an implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional approaches for power reduction optimize the amount of capacitive load [4,6] or the amount of capacitive load and short-circuit current [5,7] based on the transition activity information obtained beforehand. None of the conventional approaches explicitly optimize the number of transitions for power reduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%