2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1011336525599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Hassles Scale (DeLongis et al, 1988), revised for African American women, was used to assess daily hassles in a number of areas. In the version of the scale used in this study, we omitted items that would not be relevant to poor, urban African American women (e.g., financial investments) and added items not in the original scale that would apply to the current sample (e.g., your ex-spouse; see Smith et al, 2001). The family hassles score was obtained by counting the number of family-related hassles items that the woman had endorsed (maximum 12).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Hassles Scale (DeLongis et al, 1988), revised for African American women, was used to assess daily hassles in a number of areas. In the version of the scale used in this study, we omitted items that would not be relevant to poor, urban African American women (e.g., financial investments) and added items not in the original scale that would apply to the current sample (e.g., your ex-spouse; see Smith et al, 2001). The family hassles score was obtained by counting the number of family-related hassles items that the woman had endorsed (maximum 12).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This social context includes, among others, family members, friends, neighborhood, and health care providers. The family, in particular, can be a source of support for inner-city African American women (Boyd-Franklin, 1989; Smith et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hassles Scale (DeLongis, Folkman, & Lazarus, 1988), revised for African American women, was used to assess daily hassles in a number of areas. In the version of the scale used in this study, we omitted items that would not be relevant to poor, urban women (e.g., financial investments) and added items not in the original scale that would apply to the current sample (e.g., your ex-spouse; see Smith et al, 2001). The family hassles score was obtained by counting the number of family-related hassles items that the woman endorsed (maximum 12).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale has 14 subscales consisting of 2 items each which measure different coping strategies. These coping strategies can be grouped in two sub-scales namely active and avoidant coping (Smith et al, 2001). The following coping strategies can be categorised as active coping: active coping, planning, humour, positive framing, acceptance, religion, use of emotional support, and use of instrumental (practical) support.…”
Section: Brief Copementioning
confidence: 99%