1979
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-41692-6.50012-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical Aspects of the Chemical Control of Nematodes in Soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, studies on the use of plant VOCs against PPNs have expanded . Biofumigation, consisting of the incorporation of plant residues that slowly release their bioactive compounds into the soil, has been successfully used to control PPNs since the 19th century . Compounds resulting from field biofumigation have proven nematicidal activities, and the best example is isothiocyanates emitted by brassicas .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, studies on the use of plant VOCs against PPNs have expanded . Biofumigation, consisting of the incorporation of plant residues that slowly release their bioactive compounds into the soil, has been successfully used to control PPNs since the 19th century . Compounds resulting from field biofumigation have proven nematicidal activities, and the best example is isothiocyanates emitted by brassicas .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7,[14][15][16] Biofumigation, consisting of the incorporation of plant residues that slowly release their bioactive compounds into the soil, has been successfully used to control PPNs since the 19th century. 17 Compounds resulting from field biofumigation have proven nematicidal activities, and the best example is isothiocyanates emitted by brassicas. [18][19][20] In the last decade, studies addressing VOCs released by plant residues have revealed a number of molecules with nematicidal activity similar to commercial nematicides, 6,7,14,15 therefore further studies are needed to identify VOCs emitted in biofumigation processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ultimate test of the use of metam‐sodium or isothiocyanate‐based biofumigation is the biological activity achieved by the isothiocyanates in soil. Despite its propensity to be highly sorbed, practical field use over the last 50 years has shown that methyl isothiocyanate from metam‐sodium can achieve its potential by effectively controlling many soil‐borne noxious organisms, although the variability of results from even the typically high commercial application rates is well recognised 14. Given that a wide range of other isothiocyanate‐precursor glucosolinates, both aliphatic and aromatic, occur in brassicas, the question arises as to what is the biological activity of other isothiocyanates (see Reference 15 for details of the structural chemistry of the isothiocyanates) relative to that of methyl isothiocyanate in the soil environment, and what may be the effect of different environmental conditions such as temperature on the expression of that activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several of these fumigants are also known to adversely affect soil N balances through their temporary inhibition of nitrification. This can lead to the accumulation of ammonia and the poisoning of ammonia-sensitive crops (19). It has been shown previously that the autotrophic nitrifying bacterium Nitrosomonas europaea is capable of co-oxidizing numerous aliphatic, cyclic, and halogenated hydrocarbons (including the soil fumigant methyl bromide) through the action of the ammonia-oxidizing enzyme ammonia monooxygenase (AMO) (1, [11][12][13][14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%