2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2008.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical coexistence of two species in the chemostat – A slow–fast characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After 35 days a “quasi steady state” was obtained between the wildtype and mutant, a phenomenon which has been described previously in chemostat cultures [40]. The reasons for the maintenance of competing strains in the chemostat remains controversial and is subject to continuing mathematical investigation [41], [42]. When the dilution rate was then switched to a fast growth rate the selective advantage was lost, the wild type recovered and both strains returned to approximately equivalent amounts (Figure 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…After 35 days a “quasi steady state” was obtained between the wildtype and mutant, a phenomenon which has been described previously in chemostat cultures [40]. The reasons for the maintenance of competing strains in the chemostat remains controversial and is subject to continuing mathematical investigation [41], [42]. When the dilution rate was then switched to a fast growth rate the selective advantage was lost, the wild type recovered and both strains returned to approximately equivalent amounts (Figure 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The classical model of competition for a nonreproducing substrate in a well-stirred chemostat operated under constant input concentration and dilution predicts competitive exclusion. That is, it predicts that at most one competitor population avoids extinction [6,21,25,26]. However, the coexistence of competing populations is ubiquitous in nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R 5 + , the closed non-negative cone in R 5 , is positively invariant by the system (2.6) [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. More precisely, let m = min(mS, mV , mE, mI , mR), then I get Proposition 1.…”
Section: Generalitiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since arithmetical mean of nonnegative real numbers is greater than the geometrical one, we have the following inequalities [30] for other application). Define…”
Section: Proof Consider the Following Lyapunov Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation