Compound-specific isotope analysis of nitrogen (δ 15 N) in amino acids (CSIA-AA) has significantly contributed to environmental sciences such as anthropology, biogeochemistry, and ecology. Several methods exist for determining δ 15 N of amino acids (AAs). Although these methods have their own strength and weakness, they have not been intercalibrated yet, especially for biological samples with matrices. To address this issue, we systematically compared AA δ 15 N values among three methods using gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC/C/IRMS), preparative liquid chromatography (LC) separation followed by elemental analyzer/ IRMS (LC Â EA/IRMS), and LC separation followed by GC/C/IRMS (LC Â GC/C/IRMS). The δ 15 N values of glutamic acid (δ 15 N Glu ) and phenylalanine (δ 15 N Phe ) in fish muscle, two crucial AAs for estimating the trophic positions (TPs) of organisms, were compared among methods. Although a significant difference in fish muscle δ 15 N Glu values was found among the three analytical methods, their δ 15 N Glu and δ 15 N Phe values were fairly consistent between all pairs of methods (n = 8, R 2 = 0.9968 for GC/C/IRMS vs. LC Â GC/C/IRMS; 0.9936 for LC Â EA/IRMS vs. LC Â GC/C/IRMS; and 0.9912 for GC/C/IRMS vs. LC Â EA/IRMS), which resulted in similar TP estimates among the methods. Thus, the results provide empirical validation that the CSIA-AA is comparable among different methods in interdisciplinary research fields. We also highlighted some critical features of each of the three analytical methods that can be used as a guideline for future CSIA-AA research.