2007
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jba.2950060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical implications of GPR investigation using 3D data reconstruction and transmission tomography

Abstract: Non-destructive investigation using ground penetrating radar is becoming more popular in the inspection of civil structures. Currently, traditional 2D imaging is used as a preliminary tool to fi nd possible areas of interest for more detailed inspection, which can be accomplished by more advanced techniques like 3D image reconstruction or tomography. In this paper, a general overview of the work done at University of Minho regarding these techniques is presented, together with their limitations and advantages … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter effect is a result of the antenna radiation pattern emitting waves in all directions and the reflected energy being recorded before and after the GPR is directly over the feature (Huisman et al, 2003). Three‐dimensional radar records can be directly acquired or reconstructed by performing a linear interpolation between successive two‐dimensional radar records (Topczewski et al, 2007). See Daniels (2004), Conyers (2004), Neal (2004), and van der Kruk et al (1998) for more detailed discussion of GPR fundamentals and operation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter effect is a result of the antenna radiation pattern emitting waves in all directions and the reflected energy being recorded before and after the GPR is directly over the feature (Huisman et al, 2003). Three‐dimensional radar records can be directly acquired or reconstructed by performing a linear interpolation between successive two‐dimensional radar records (Topczewski et al, 2007). See Daniels (2004), Conyers (2004), Neal (2004), and van der Kruk et al (1998) for more detailed discussion of GPR fundamentals and operation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information from the travel time or the amplitude from many transmitter-receiver pairs is then used to reconstruct the hidden structure through the use of special inversion algorithms. In general terms, the radar velocity tomography technique has already been successfully applied to the inspection of masonry structures (Binda et al 2003, Topczewski et al 2006. In concrete, tomographic research has been primarily based on acoustic waves (Olson 2004), while the radar technique has not previously been reported according to our knowledge.…”
Section: Transmission or Tomography Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, simulation and laboratory tests in simple and flat masonry samples have been carried out with the purpose of enhancing the GPR processing data for the detection of unfilled joints [12], highlighting the difficulty in recognizing reflections caused by voids in real data, but without obtaining realistic images of the media. More complex walls were also evaluated to define irregularities by means of GPR tomography [13]. Other structures, such as masonry arch bridges, were also tested in laboratory and simulated in order to define the crack size range that could be detected with GPR [14] and evaluated in different applications [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%