2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical issues relating to soil column chromatography for sorption parameter determination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quality control measurements were executed as suggested by Bi et al [24] and method performance was overall comparable with our preceding study on SOC [12]. Clay columns were firstly evaluated by assessing the retention factor k of analytes at different flow rates between 0.025 and 0.15 mL min −1 (Additional file 1: Figure S1).…”
Section: Data Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality control measurements were executed as suggested by Bi et al [24] and method performance was overall comparable with our preceding study on SOC [12]. Clay columns were firstly evaluated by assessing the retention factor k of analytes at different flow rates between 0.025 and 0.15 mL min −1 (Additional file 1: Figure S1).…”
Section: Data Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the first moment analysis could not be applied for peak analysis because the method is susceptible to errors in case of strongly tailing peaks. For this reason, the retention times were determined as a median value using the half mass point method as proposed previously [25]. It consists in dividing the peak area into two equal parts.…”
Section: Determination Of Thermodynamic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geochemical processes during the stabilization of potentially toxic elements in contaminated soil using mineral amendments [xv] LIST OF TABLES (Limousin et al, 2007;Bi et al, 2010) 2-6: Toxic effects of some trace metals and their relationship with human activities (Kabata-Pendias et al, 2007;Carolin et al, 2017;Tabelin et al, 2018) Geochemical processes during the stabilization of potentially toxic elements in contaminated soil using mineral amendments…”
Section: περιληψηmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these difficulties, dynamic sorption has some advantages compared to static sorption (Table 2-2), the most important being the simulation of field conditions. (Limousin et al, 2007;Bi et al, 2010). Advantages Disadvantages High solid:liquid ratios, being more accurate in describing the processes that occur in a natural system (i.e.…”
Section: Dynamic Sorption Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation