2012
DOI: 10.12795/ph.2012.v26.i01.05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pragmatic Implications of Expanded Deictic Structures: Deixis as an Expression of the Concept of Face in the Spanish Parliament

Abstract: Este trabajo intenta dilucidar las implicaciones pragmáticas del uso de estructuras deícticas expandidas consistentes en estructuras deícticas en tercera persona que tienen como referente una primera persona, dentro de la esfera política española. En particular, analizaremos la estructura "este/a diputado/a" (referente→yo) y "este grupo parlamentario" (referente→nosotros/as) en el contexto de cuatro sesiones en el congreso de los diputados que tuvieron lugar en 2004 sobre una variedad de temas. El uso menciona… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the topic may be the same, different speech contexts may influence the pronominal choices of the politicians. Similar findings on the use of inclusive and exclusive ‘we’ as alignment and disalignment strategies were also found in other studies on political speeches and political debates in Spain (Blas Arroyo, 1998, 2000; Carranza Márquez, 2012), as well as in Mexico (De Fina, 1995) and the United States (Silvestre-López, 2004).…”
Section: Previous Studies On Evasion In Political Discoursesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Although the topic may be the same, different speech contexts may influence the pronominal choices of the politicians. Similar findings on the use of inclusive and exclusive ‘we’ as alignment and disalignment strategies were also found in other studies on political speeches and political debates in Spain (Blas Arroyo, 1998, 2000; Carranza Márquez, 2012), as well as in Mexico (De Fina, 1995) and the United States (Silvestre-López, 2004).…”
Section: Previous Studies On Evasion In Political Discoursesupporting
confidence: 87%