2011
DOI: 10.1177/0146167211402215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Pray for Those Who Mistreat You”: Effects of Prayer on Anger and Aggression

Abstract: Although some religious teachings have been used to justify aggression, most religious teachings promote peace in human affairs. Three experiments tested the hypothesis that praying for others brings out the more peaceful side of religion by reducing anger and aggression after a provocation. In Experiment 1, praying for a stranger led provoked participants to report less anger than control participants who thought about a stranger. In Experiment 2, provoked participants who prayed for the person who angered th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
54
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction between thought suppression and prayer remained significant when controlling for religiosity (F(1, 56) = 4.32, p = .042, g p 2 = .072) and when treating religiosity as a z-standardized continuous predictor in a multiple regression analysis, the two-way interaction between thought suppression and prayer remained marginally significant (t(53) = À1.94, p = .058) while the three-way interaction with religiosity was not significant (t(53) = À1.14, p = .260). These results are in line with previous research (Bremner et al, 2011;Friese & Wänke, 2014;Lambert, Fincham, Stillman, Graham, & Beach, 2010;Rounding et al, 2012). However, due to the small sample size it is not possible to confidently rule out a possible moderation by religiosity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The interaction between thought suppression and prayer remained significant when controlling for religiosity (F(1, 56) = 4.32, p = .042, g p 2 = .072) and when treating religiosity as a z-standardized continuous predictor in a multiple regression analysis, the two-way interaction between thought suppression and prayer remained marginally significant (t(53) = À1.94, p = .058) while the three-way interaction with religiosity was not significant (t(53) = À1.14, p = .260). These results are in line with previous research (Bremner et al, 2011;Friese & Wänke, 2014;Lambert, Fincham, Stillman, Graham, & Beach, 2010;Rounding et al, 2012). However, due to the small sample size it is not possible to confidently rule out a possible moderation by religiosity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The free thought condition was modeled to be as similar as possible to the prayer condition except for the subjective awareness that one is praying and not merely thinking. It paralleled previous control conditions for personal prayer (Bremner et al, 2011) except that in previous research participants were asked to think about a particular person while in the present study they were allowed to think about anything they wished.…”
Section: Prayer Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Participation in religious activity has been linked to outcomes such as better perceived health, decreased aggression, increased self-esteem, less suicidal ideation, and lower prevalence of depression (e.g., Bremner, Koole, & Bushman, 2011; Crescentini & Capurso, 2015; Koole, Govorun, Cheng, & Gallucci, 2009). It is interesting that some of the participants who are Christian responded that they find strength and peace from prayer meetings and meditation in their daily lives.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%