2009
DOI: 10.1080/13602380802667353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-clusterization in emerging markets: the Toyota group's entry process in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resource commitments and local learning. This confirms earlier studies such as Buckley and Ghauri(2004) and Vahlne(1977 and2009). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Resource commitments and local learning. This confirms earlier studies such as Buckley and Ghauri(2004) and Vahlne(1977 and2009). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Recent studies have found that firms enter foreign markets as a network at a certain point of time, which is labeled as "pre-clusterization." (Hatani, 2009;Buckley and Horn, 2009). Pre-clusterization is defined as an advanced form of network-based foreign entry, where firms in a business group enter an emerging market and begin to cluster in the location that the core firm targets (Hatani, 2009).…”
Section: Networking and The Speed Of Foreign Market Entrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1998 these activities in Tianjin were extended with the establishment of Toyota-affiliated suppliers. In what has been termed 'pre-clusterisation', 59 Toyota developed partnerships and built up a substantial local supplier network. Following government approval in 2000, Sichuan Toyota Motor Co Ltd was founded, and in a 50:50 JV with the First Automotive Works (FAW) group the minibus model Coaster was produced.…”
Section: Success Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a very important aspect of identifying the cluster, Brito and Costa (2009), Felzensztein (2008), Chong Ju Choi et al (1999), Pearl (2010), Xiaoqiang (2009), Jucevičius and Puidokas (2007) distinguish multiple connections between the cluster members. The end product and the role of scientific institutions as an integral part of cluster in order to identify the formation are stressed by Porter (1990), Porter (2000), Schumpeter (1930), Romer (1998), Montresor and Marzetti (2008), Brito and Costa (2009), Felzensztein (2008), Hatani (2009), Williams and Claiborne (2009), Jucevičius and Puidokas (2007).…”
Section: The Definition Of Clustermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, in the literature, the definition of cluster stresses either the perception of the value chain or the sector arrangement. The first approach has been developed by Porter (1990), Porter (2000), Romer (1998), Silvestre and Dalcol (2010), Brito and Costa (2009), Hatani (2009), Pearl (2010), Xiaoqiang (2009), Williams and Claiborne (2009), Callarisa Fiol (2009), . The sector approach is followed by Montresor and Marzetti (2008), Silvestre and Dalcol (2010), Felzensztein (2008), Xiaoqiang (2009).…”
Section: The Definition Of Clustermentioning
confidence: 99%