Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) Boundary-Node Behavior for the Single Marking (SM) Mode of Operation

Charny, A.; Zhang, J.; Karagiannis, Georgios; Menth, Michael; Taylor, Tom

doi:10.17487/rfc6662

Cited by 12 publications

(44 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The termination algorithms described in [RFC6661] and [RFC6662] require the preferential dropping of ETM-marked packets to avoid over-termination in the case of packet loss. An analysis explaining this phenomenon can be found in Section 4 of [Menth10].…”

Section: Preferential Packet Droppingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Overview of Pre-Congestion Notification Encoding

Karagiannis¹,

Chan²,

Moncaster³

et al. 2012

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) is to protect the quality of service (QoS) of inelastic flows within a Diffserv domain. On every link in the PCN-domain, the overall rate of PCN-traffic is metered, and PCN-packets are appropriately marked when certain configured rates are exceeded. Egress nodes provide decision points with information about the PCN-marks of PCN-packets that allows them to take decisions about whether to admit or block a new flow request, and to terminate some already admitted flows during serious pre-congestion.

show abstract

Section: Preferential Packet Droppingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Egress nodes monitor the PCN-marks of received PCN-packets and provide information about the PCN-marks to the decision points that take decisions about the flow admission and termination on this basis [RFC6661] [RFC6662].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Overview of Pre-Congestion Notification Encoding

Karagiannis¹,

Chan²,

Moncaster³

et al. 2012

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Pre-congestion notification (PCN) protects inelastic traffic by flow admission and flow termination [1] when certain criteria related to the network load are met [2,3] . Decisions to take actions nodes has been suggested by other authors [5,6] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hence, it is expected that results from existing research on the effectiveness of dPCN are also valid when cPCN is used. As in the aforementioned references [1][2][3][4][5][6] , our specifications and simulations are based on 'traditional' networks assuming an interior gateway protocol and destination based forwarding. However, the cPCN signaling architecture fits very well to the centralized nature of the control architecture of emerging Software Defined Networks (SDN, see e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Flow termination signaling in the centralized pre-congestion notification architecture

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

a b s t r a c tPre-congestion notification (PCN) protects inelastic traffic by using feedback on network link loads on and acting upon this accordingly. These actions comprise to admission control and termination of flows. Two PCN architectures have been defined by IETF: the centralized and decentralized PCN architecture. The decentralized PCN architecture has received much attention in the literature whereas the centralized PCN architecture has not. In the decentralized architecture, feedback is sent from the egress nodes to ingress nodes, which then take and apply decisions regarding admission of new flows and/or termination of ongoing flows. Signaling occurs only between ingress and egress nodes.In the centralized architecture these decisions are made at a central node, which requires proper signaling for action and information exchange between the central node and the egress and ingress nodes. This signaling has been suggested by other authors, but is not fully defined yet. Our contribution is twofold. We define signaling in the centralized PCN architecture focussing on flow termination, which completes the definition of the signaling in the centralized PCN architecture. Secondly, we run extensive simulations showing that the proposed signaling works well and that the performances of the centralized PCN and the decentralized PCN architectures are similar. Hence, it is expected that results from existing research on the effectiveness of decentralized PCN are also valid when the centralized PCN architecture is used.

show abstract

Joint In-network Video Rate Adaptation and Measurement-Based Admission Control: Algorithm Design and Evaluation

Latré

Turck

2012

J Netw Syst Manage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The important new revenue opportunities that multimedia services offer to network and service providers come with important management challenges. For providers, it is important to control the video quality that is offered and perceived by the user, typically known as the Quality of Experience (QoE). Both admission control and scalable video coding techniques can control the QoE by blocking connections or adapting the video rate but influence each other's performance. In this article, we propose an in-network video rate adaptation mechanism that enables a provider to define a policy on how the video rate adaptation should be performed to maximize the provider's objective (e.g., a maximization of revenue or QoE). We discuss the need for a close interaction of the video rate adaptation algorithm with a measurement based admission control system, allowing to effectively orchestrate both algorithms and timely switch from video rate adaptation to the blocking of connections. We propose two different rate adaptation decision algorithms that calculate which videos need to be adapted: an optimal one in terms of the provider's policy and a heuristic based on the utility of each connection. Through an extensive performance evaluation, we show the impact of both algorithms on the rate adaptation, network utilisation and the stability of the video rate adaptation. We show that both algorithms outperform other configurations with at least 10%. Moreover, we show that the proposed heuristic is about 500 times faster than the optimal algorithm and experiences only a performance drop of approximately 2%, given the investigated video delivery scenario.

show abstract

Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) Boundary-Node Behavior for the Single Marking (SM) Mode of Operation

Cited by 12 publications

References 13 publications

Overview of Pre-Congestion Notification Encoding

Overview of Pre-Congestion Notification Encoding

Flow termination signaling in the centralized pre-congestion notification architecture

Joint In-network Video Rate Adaptation and Measurement-Based Admission Control: Algorithm Design and Evaluation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About