2020
DOI: 10.1097/jnc.0000000000000115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Knowledge and Use Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in a Small Metropolitan Region of the Southeastern United States

Abstract: Men who have sex with men (MSM) in the southeastern United States continue to be at high risk for HIV. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) provides effective prevention, but PrEP awareness varies across communities. We assessed sexual risk, HIV/sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing history, health care experiences associated with PrEP awareness, provider discussions, and PrEP use in a sample of 164 MSM in the Central Savannah River Area of the South. Results revealed that 80.5% of participants were aware of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage of YMSM who transitioned from willingness to use PrEP to actual usage experienced the most significant decline, dropping to less than one in seven (13.94%). Specifically, the rate of PrEP usage among YMSM was 7.61%, which is lower than that reported in several studies conducted in the US (9.20% [25], 8.2% [26], and 10% [27]). However, compared with the results of a survey conducted in Shanghai, China, during 2012-2013, the rate of PrEP use in this study was greater, indicating that the number of users is gradually increasing with the advancement of PrEP application efforts in China.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…The percentage of YMSM who transitioned from willingness to use PrEP to actual usage experienced the most significant decline, dropping to less than one in seven (13.94%). Specifically, the rate of PrEP usage among YMSM was 7.61%, which is lower than that reported in several studies conducted in the US (9.20% [25], 8.2% [26], and 10% [27]). However, compared with the results of a survey conducted in Shanghai, China, during 2012-2013, the rate of PrEP use in this study was greater, indicating that the number of users is gradually increasing with the advancement of PrEP application efforts in China.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Our data reinforce that PrEP use among gay and bisexual men remains low in the United States [34]. Our national probability estimate of 6.6% PrEP uptake over the course of our study is on the low end of estimates for PrEP uptake from clinical [35][36][37]; and community samples [14,38,39]. Although our data demonstrate PrEP use increased by 90% (from 4.14% to 7.81%) from wave 1 to wave 3, indicating greater coverage over the course of three years, there is substantial room for improvement.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Di Inggris, PPrP tergolong efektif secara kegunaan maupun secara biaya (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, 2021). Pada 164 sampel di Central Savannah River Area (CSRA), PPrP didapatkan 80,5% peserta sadar akan penggunaan PPrP, 16,4% sudah berdiskusi dengan konselor dan 9,2% sudah menggunakan PPrP (Griffin, Eldridge-Smith, Yohannan, & Stepleman, 2020). Di Cina, jika PPrP terbukti berfungsi, penggunaan PPrP akan diterima sebanyak 75,34% (Si et al, 2020).…”
Section: Hasil Peran Dan Efektivitas Profilaksis Pra-pajananunclassified