2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2954987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-Flight Conflict Detection and Resolution for UAV Integration in Shared Airspace: Sendai 2030 Model Case

Abstract: The increasing demand for services performed by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) requires the simulation of Unmanned Aircraft System Traffic Management (UTM) systems. In particular, Pre-Flight Conflict Detection and Resolution (CDR) methods need to scale to future demand levels and generate conflict-free paths for a potentially large number of UAVs before actual takeoff. However, few studies have examined realistic scenarios and the requirements for the UTM system. In this paper, we focus on the Sendai 2030 mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, regarding the implementation of particular in-flight services, there are different approaches for conflict resolution and emergency management. Many works [28][29][30] have focused on flight planning and scheduling at a strategic level, i.e., in the pre-flight phase; though in-flight automated decision-making has not been properly covered in UTM systems. In general, given the massive search space to find optimal resolutions for conflicts in Very Low-Level (VLL) airspace scenarios, approximate solutions based on heuristic solvers [28] or lane maneuvers [30] predominate over optimal deconfliction approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, regarding the implementation of particular in-flight services, there are different approaches for conflict resolution and emergency management. Many works [28][29][30] have focused on flight planning and scheduling at a strategic level, i.e., in the pre-flight phase; though in-flight automated decision-making has not been properly covered in UTM systems. In general, given the massive search space to find optimal resolutions for conflicts in Very Low-Level (VLL) airspace scenarios, approximate solutions based on heuristic solvers [28] or lane maneuvers [30] predominate over optimal deconfliction approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [127], one of the first proposals for a UTM construct -"Internet of Drones" [128] -emphasised the importance of such interdisciplinary approaches by combining best practices in air traffic control networks, cellular networks as well as the internet to devising one of the first UTM constructs in scientific literature. Since then we have witnessed a clear interest in such holistic research as seen in [5], [102], [127], [129]- [136] on UTM systems, in addition to domain-specific research on airspace design in [101], [111], [113]- [120], collision avoidance and risk mitigation in [103]- [106], [137]- [146] and communication and cybersecurity in [96]- [100], [147]- [159] as summarised below in Table 2.…”
Section: Uav Traffic Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radmanesh et al generated collision-free 3D trajectories for multiple UAVs operating in shared airspace based on a partial differential equation (PDE) and modeling the porosity values as a function of the risk of conflict [8]. Ho et al used preflight conflict detection, and resolution (CDR) methods generate to conflict-free paths for a potentially large number of UAVs before actual takeoff [9]. Based on the established protect zone, the closest point of approach (CPA) strategy is employed by Shi et al to detect potential conflicts [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%