1997
DOI: 10.14214/aff.7519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-harvest measurement of pine stands for sawing production planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
59
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
59
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Better and more accurate information on reserves of marked stands would result in more optimal allocation of cutting operations. With the help of additional information sawmills may reduce trimming losses, avoid unmarketable raw materials and steer the fl ow of wood to the best secondary processing destinations (Uusitalo 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Better and more accurate information on reserves of marked stands would result in more optimal allocation of cutting operations. With the help of additional information sawmills may reduce trimming losses, avoid unmarketable raw materials and steer the fl ow of wood to the best secondary processing destinations (Uusitalo 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of the 15 study stands was inventoried by either the author or one of two other experienced forest professionals using the preharvest measurement method developed by Uusitalo (1997). The sampling data, typically consisting of 8 or 10 basal area measurements and roughly 30-50 sample trees measured for at least DBH, was analyzed using the EMO software package planned and programmed by Uusitalo and Kivinen (2000).…”
Section: Standsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 10 virtual Norway spruce stands for Study IV were created using the Weibull function (Bailey andDell 1973), Näslund's height model (1936) (parameters a and b taken from Uusitalo (1997)) and Laasasenaho's stem curve equations for spruce (1982). Five 'stand types' were represented: (1) a stand with a normal DBH distribution and a small mean DBH; (2) a stand with a normal DBH distribution and a large mean DBH; (3) a stand with a uniform DBH distribution; (4) a stand with a right-skewed DBH distribution; and (5) a stand with a left-skewed DBH distribution.…”
Section: Standsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Nordic countries, the quality of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) trees is of particular interest, since the quality of this species and its effects on product recovery can be somewhat estimated based on external tree properties [2]. The most influential quality factors are the stem form, the heights of the lowest living (lb) and dead branches (db) and the branch size distribution (diameter, location and number of branches) (e.g., [2,3]), of which the branch size distribution has the most pronounced effect on timber quality [4]. Bucking of the tree stems is affected by the lengths of the branchless trunk section, dead branch section and living crown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%