2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre/post-closure assessment of groundwater pharmaceutical fate in a wastewater-facility-impacted stream reach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(75 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences (permutation N = 9999 probability of being the same = 0.0001) in the centroids of cumulative median detections and concentrations were observed between sites with (detections median: 3, IQR: 2-9; cumulative concentrations median: 62 ng/L; IQR: 20-405 ng/L) and without permitted wastewater discharges (detections median: 1, IQR: 0-3; cumulative concentrations median: 11 ng/L; IQR: 0-55 ng/L). These results are consistent with the documented importance of WWTP discharges as pharmaceutical-contaminant sources [84,85] and the substantial pharmaceutical-contaminant reductions in urban-area wadeable streams following WWTP-treatment upgrades [84,85] or WWTP closures [86,87].…”
Section: Pharmaceutical Mixtures Were Common In All Regionssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Differences (permutation N = 9999 probability of being the same = 0.0001) in the centroids of cumulative median detections and concentrations were observed between sites with (detections median: 3, IQR: 2-9; cumulative concentrations median: 62 ng/L; IQR: 20-405 ng/L) and without permitted wastewater discharges (detections median: 1, IQR: 0-3; cumulative concentrations median: 11 ng/L; IQR: 0-55 ng/L). These results are consistent with the documented importance of WWTP discharges as pharmaceutical-contaminant sources [84,85] and the substantial pharmaceutical-contaminant reductions in urban-area wadeable streams following WWTP-treatment upgrades [84,85] or WWTP closures [86,87].…”
Section: Pharmaceutical Mixtures Were Common In All Regionssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Despite the relatively minor impacts in terms of the total mass load to larger water bodies (e.g., high-flow rivers), continuous high pharmaceutical loading to small, local streams can generate substantially elevated exposure concentrations due to limited dilution and potentially impact biota. Furthermore, groundwater recharge in the temperate-region, losing-reach stream (due to effluent influx) can cause pharmaceuticals to also be transported along subsurface pathways into adjacent aquifers and could pose potential risks to drinking water sources . Our work also demonstrates the potential benefits of treated wastewater effluent in a small stream, such as maintaining the streamflow during baseflow/drought conditions and modulating water temperature fluctuations (i.e., cooling effect in the summer and warming effect in the winter).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a paucity of knowledge concerning dynamic pharmaceutical concentrations and compositions in streams, despite the potential for drug–drug interactions (e.g., synergistic, antagonistic responses) in complex exposure mixtures. Mounting evidence suggests that pharmaceuticals can have deleterious effects on aquatic species at environmentally relevant concentrations (i.e., <1 μg/L). For example, pharmaceuticals can cause behavior changes, endocrine disruption, and reduced size and fecundity in fish. , Substantial transport of pharmaceuticals with varied attenuation (e.g., half-lives from hours to days) has been documented in effluent-impacted streams. ,, Composition of evolving pharmaceutical mixtures may depend not only on the input variability (e.g., different sources, seasonal usage) but also on differential in-stream attenuation processes of individual compounds; , for example, biotransformation and sorption can differ substantially. , Due to constant source inputs, many pharmaceuticals are considered “pseudo-persistent”, but input variability and mixture dynamics are poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this fact, that is the reason why simulation, prediction and monitoring of groundwater parameters using Galerkin's Finite Element Method were used to simulate the mass transport of groundwater parameters concentration within Trans-Amadi area in Port Harcourt upon a given distance. The pollution is increasing and resultantly groundwater is contaminating (Adrover et al, 2017;Bishop et al, 2017;Bradley et al, 2016;Bricker et al, 2017;Fackrell et al, 2016;Fisher et al, 2016;K'Oreje et al, 2016;LaGro et al, 2017;Lamastra et al, 2016;Ma et al, 2016a;Ma et al, 2016b;Richardson et al, 2017;Robertson et al, 2016;Sanciolo and Gray, 2017;Yan et al, 2017a;Yan et al, 2017b). The integration of finite element techniques is proved to efficient technique for evaluation of trans-Amadi groundwater parameters and could possibly be used for the monitoring of ground water to evaluate the effect of pollution on water quality (Alaboodi and Hussain, 2017;Awais et al, 2017;Boffi and Stenberg, 2017;Hedayat et al, 2017;Jacques et al, 2017;Jeong et al, 2017;Keith et al, 2017;Lee et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2017;Lostado-Lorza et al, 2017;Mironova et al, 2017).…”
Section: Prediction Of Groundwater Parameters Interaction Bymentioning
confidence: 99%