2009
DOI: 10.1080/14675980903138624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre‐service teacher intercultural sensitivity assessment as a basis for addressing multiculturalism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that there is no significant difference in psychological counseling candidates' perception level of intercultural sensitivity in terms of gender. This finding is in line with the findings of the studies which examined the effect of gender on intercultural sensitivity (Chen & Starosta, 2000;Rengi & Polat, 2014;Spinthourakis, Karatzia-Stavlioti & Roussakis, 2009;Üstün, 2011;Yılmaz & Göçen, 2013). Besides, it has also emerged that there are research studies which claim that the mean of the total score which female students got from the scale significantly differs from the mean of the total score which male students got from the scale (Banos, 2006;Holm, Nokelainen & Tirri, 2009;Banos, 2006).…”
Section: Conclusion Discussion and Suggestionssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…It was found that there is no significant difference in psychological counseling candidates' perception level of intercultural sensitivity in terms of gender. This finding is in line with the findings of the studies which examined the effect of gender on intercultural sensitivity (Chen & Starosta, 2000;Rengi & Polat, 2014;Spinthourakis, Karatzia-Stavlioti & Roussakis, 2009;Üstün, 2011;Yılmaz & Göçen, 2013). Besides, it has also emerged that there are research studies which claim that the mean of the total score which female students got from the scale significantly differs from the mean of the total score which male students got from the scale (Banos, 2006;Holm, Nokelainen & Tirri, 2009;Banos, 2006).…”
Section: Conclusion Discussion and Suggestionssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This can be listed as physical and psychological handicaps, age, gender, economic and social status, race, language spoken, type of education received, place they were raised as well as movie and media sector (Banos, 2006;Bayles, 2009;Boyd, 2015;Çayır & Ceyhan Ayan, 2013;De et al, 2015;Fretheim, 2007;Gay, 2014;Ryan et. al, 2007;Spinthourakis et al, 2009;Talib ve Hosoya, 2010;Westrick & Yuen, 2007;Yuen & Grossman, 2009). The positive oriented development in the control group can be given as an example to this.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Öğretmen adaylarının kültürlerarası duyarlılık puanları arasında cinsiyet değişkeni açısından kadın öğretmen adaylarının puan ortalamaları erkeklerden az bir fark ile yüksek olsa da herhangi bir anlamlı farklılık tespit edilmemiştir. Alanyazınında, kadın ilkokul ve ortaokul öğrencilerinin lehine çalışmalar bulunsa da (Holme, Petri ve Kirsi, 2006; Micó-Cebrián ve Cava, 2014) mevcut araştırmanın bulgusunda öğretmen adayı ve öğretmenler (Akın, 2016;Bayles, 2009;Erdoğan, 2018;Güner ve Levent, 2018;Spinthourakis, Karatzia-Stavlioti ve Roussakis, 2009;Üstün, 2011;Yılmaz ve Göçen, 2013), üniversite hazırlık sınıfında öğrenim görmekte olan öğrenciler (Çiloğlan ve Bardakçı, 2019) (Demir ve Üstün, 2017;Üstün, 2011). Güler (2012), yeni bir dil öğrenen öğrencilerin yabancı dilin yanı sıra yeni bir kültür, coğrafya ve dünya ile tanıştığını ifade etmiştir.…”
Section: Tartışma Sonuç Ve öNerilerunclassified