2012
DOI: 10.1177/0002764212466235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precarious Work and Flexibilization in South and Southeast Asia

Abstract: This article briefly recapitulates the social, economic, and political factors that led to the rise and consolidation of precarious work in various countries in Asia and the definition of "precarious work." The article then considers the utility of precarious work for describing the growth of work that is uncertain and insecure and in which risks are shifted from employers to workers for several countries in South and Southeast Asia, namely, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Vietnam, Sri Lanka, and India.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
50
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…"Contrary to many expectations", Chang writes, "that growing national wealth or poverty reduction could resolve the problem of the growing informal sector in developing countries, the bigger the economy grew, the bigger became the population that came to work informally" (Chang, 2009, p. 165). In some cases, the hazards and health risks of work as well as its insecurity have also increased (Hewison and Kalleberg, 2013). This process of informalisation occurs in different ways and countries have their own distinctive informalisation pathways.…”
Section: Thread 1: Sectoral and Livelihood Change And Community Resilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Contrary to many expectations", Chang writes, "that growing national wealth or poverty reduction could resolve the problem of the growing informal sector in developing countries, the bigger the economy grew, the bigger became the population that came to work informally" (Chang, 2009, p. 165). In some cases, the hazards and health risks of work as well as its insecurity have also increased (Hewison and Kalleberg, 2013). This process of informalisation occurs in different ways and countries have their own distinctive informalisation pathways.…”
Section: Thread 1: Sectoral and Livelihood Change And Community Resilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lankstumas kaip principas tapo svarbus kalbant apie įvairias su darbo santykiais susijusias dimensijas: pvz., atlyginimų lankstumas reiškė, kad alga turi priklausyti nuo paklausos ir gali lengvai kisti (dažniausiai ne darbuotojo naudai); įdarbinimo lankstumas reiškė, kad įmonėse nesunkiai ir su kuo mažesniais kaštais būtų galima pakeisti darbuotojų įdarbinimo statusą, o tai neišven-giamai siejosi su mažėjančia darbuotojų socialine apsauga; darbo lankstumas reiškė, kad įmonės gali labai paprastai ir be didelių finansinių nuostolių perkelti darbuotoją iš vienos pozicijos į kitą įmonės viduje; įgūdžių lankstumas reiškė, kad darbuotojų įgūdžiai lengvai pritaikomi ir keičiami pagal rinkos poreikius. Bendrąja prasme lankstumas, kurį propagavo klasikiniai neoliberalai, reiškė sisteminį darbuotojų silpninimą ir nesaugumo didinimą vardan geresnių galimybių vystyti verslus ir pritraukti investicijas (Harvey, 2012;Piketti 2014;Hewison, Kalleberg, 2013;Standing, 2009Standing, ir 2011Krugman, 2014 ir kt. ).…”
Section: Prekariatasunclassified
“…Antrajame skyriuje "Prekariatas" aptariama prekariato samprata ir nagrinėjama, kokios ypatybės leidžia ją apibūdinti. Daugiausia remtasi Guy Standingo koncepcija, bet, šalia šio autoriaus prekariato koncepto, siekiama analizuoti ir kitų autorių (Bennett et al, 2009;Casas-Cortes, 2014;Hewison, Kalleberg, 2013;Munk, 2013;Bommes, Geddes, 2000;Butler, 2009Butler, ir 2011Tsianos, Papadopoulos, 2006 ir kt. ) požiūrius, kurie labiausiai atsiskleidžia ketvirtajame straipsnio "Prekariato kritika ir galimybės" skyriuje.…”
unclassified
“…Globally this trend has created the basic problem of balancing flexibility for employers and security for migrant labourers. For employers, indirect recruitment strategies reduce costs, cut the permanent workforce, and maximize flexibility (Hewison and Kalleberg 2012). On the other hand, labourers receive less benefits and protections.…”
Section: Reza: Hyper-individualized Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, labourers receive less benefits and protections. While outsourced and temporary work is not the only form of precarious employment routinely offered to the migrant labourers, the typical features of precarious work include a wide range of employment arrangements such as work provided by individual labour recruiters that offer low wages, few or no benefits, limited or no collective representation, and job insecurity (Anderson 2010, Beck 2000, Hewison and Kalleberg 2012, Ross 2009, Standing 2011, Vosko 2009). The construction sector in Asian countries, Bangladesh in particular, represents many of these features.…”
Section: Reza: Hyper-individualized Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%