2019
DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precarity, gender and care in the neoliberal academy

Abstract: This article examines the rise in precarious academic employment in Ireland as an outcome of the higher education restructuring following OECD (Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development), government initiatives and post‐crisis austerity. Presenting the narratives of academic women at different career stages, we claim that a focus on care sheds new light on the debate on precarity. A more complete understanding of precarity should take account not only of the contractual security but also affective… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
114
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
114
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the accomplishment of the cooperative principles gave them the opportunity to control the work process, and through that implement the arrangements that favour their individual needs. The fact that women who take up flexible arrangements (i.e., part-time or temporary work) are at a disadvantage when it comes to taking up their former job, leading them to side-line their professional development [89], is also of primary importance. The women surveyed trust that the cooperative model offers them a friendly way to progress in a professional career while avoiding the dysfunctional effects from flexible work-life arrangements, such as underemployment, loss of pay, and long-term pension insecurity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the accomplishment of the cooperative principles gave them the opportunity to control the work process, and through that implement the arrangements that favour their individual needs. The fact that women who take up flexible arrangements (i.e., part-time or temporary work) are at a disadvantage when it comes to taking up their former job, leading them to side-line their professional development [89], is also of primary importance. The women surveyed trust that the cooperative model offers them a friendly way to progress in a professional career while avoiding the dysfunctional effects from flexible work-life arrangements, such as underemployment, loss of pay, and long-term pension insecurity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there is scope to examine the content of impact cases and different configurations of impact case teams (including and beyond business and management studies). Positive exemplars of women who successfully overcame gendered structures (Bird, ) can inform our understanding of how women scholars excel despite inequality regimes (Ivancheva, Lynch, & Keating, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are even asked to care for the economy, by getting back to working and spending as normal. The management of COVID‐19 has led to unbalanced expectations about who is doing caring (Minello, 2020), masculinized ideals of competitive performance (Ivancheva, Lynch, & Keating, 2019) and for some a loss of access to care as resources are diverted towards the COVID crisis. These care‐based discourses are problematic because they lack both (i) an intimate understanding of what it means to take, give and receive care (Sevenhuijsen, 2003); and (ii) reflexivity regarding the likely gendered and other inequitable consequences of mobilizing care instrumentally towards managing the COVID crisis.…”
Section: Ethics Of Care and Crisis Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%