2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-010-1581-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preceding cervical cytology in women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

Abstract: Approximately 15% of HSIL cases are under-diagnosed by cytology. Significant factors leading to cytohistologic discrepancy are lesion size and the presence of coexisting LSIL.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to add value to the predictive cytologic diagnosis because currently, cervical cytology remains the primary screening method. Ideally, the degree of cytologic changes should reflect the severity of the lesion histologically diagnosed 14, 15. However, subjectivity is a feature of the morphological diagnosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to add value to the predictive cytologic diagnosis because currently, cervical cytology remains the primary screening method. Ideally, the degree of cytologic changes should reflect the severity of the lesion histologically diagnosed 14, 15. However, subjectivity is a feature of the morphological diagnosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 The possibility of false-negative results was greater when lesions involved only one quadrant, indicating that the lesion size might be related to better assessments and correct diagnoses. Songveeratham et al 22 found an $ 15% discrepancy rate (underdiagnosis) between Pap test and conization results for high-grade lesions; this was related to the small size of high-grade lesions and presence of lowgrade lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is known that cytology is only restricted to the observation of certain cells obtained during Pap smear examination and may not evaluate the exact kind or depth of potential dysplasia. This is the reason that, independent of the cytologist's experience, Pap smear examination generally underestimates the degree of dysplasia even in cases with HGSIL [19] . It is apparent that the observed percentages of CIN2+ diagnosis in our study may not be mainly attributed to cytology inaccuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%