The present article is concerned with a theoretical and experimental study of the growth kinetics of pearlite in a 0.4C-1.6Mn medium carbon steels. Factors controlling the isothermal formation of this microconstituent are explored in this work. In this sense, the transition temperature between local equilibrium (LE) and no partition local equilibrium (NPLE) growth mechanisms is theoretically determined. Moreover, the nucleation of pearlite has been considered as a cementite precipitation process on a moving austenite-ferrite interface. Finally, a theoretical model is presented in this work to calculate the evolution of austenite-to-pearlite transformation with time at a very wide temperature range.Keywords phase transformations, kinetics, steels, forging, structural
1-IntroductionPearlite is probably the most familiar microstructural feature in the whole science of metallography.It was discovered by Sorby over 100 years ago, who assumed it to be a lamellar mixture of ferrite and cementite. Pearlite is a very common constituent of a wide variety of steels, where it provides a substantial contribution to strength, so it is not surprising that this phase has received intense study [1].It is now generally agreed that during pearlite growth the alloying element distributes between the ferrite and cementite at low supersaturations (LE mechanism), and the growth is controlled by alloying element boundary diffusion. At higher supersaturations pearlite growth occurs without any partitioning of the alloying element (NPLE mechanism ) and it is controlled by carbon volume diffusion [2]. The partitioning of alloying elements has been experimentally observed by Razik et al. [3], , and Chance and Ridley [5] in a number of Fe-C-Mn, Fe-C-Si, and Fe-C-Cr alloys. In all these studies, the partitioning was observed at low supersaturations, whereas below a characteristic temperature of the steel no partition was found.Recent works have demonstrated that medium carbon forging steels with acicular ferrite microstructure can be manufactured at industrial scale [6][7][8]. The main interest of this microstructure lies in the good combination of mechanical properties that presents as compared with bainite and especially with ferritic-pearlitic microstructures. In those steels, acicular ferrite is always formed after the growth of allotriomorphic ferrite and pearlite. As a consequence, acicular ferrite transformation is inevitably influenced by previous allotriomorphic ferrite and pearlite formation. The role of the allotriomorphic ferrite to promote the formation of acicular ferrite to the detriment of bainite in a two stages heat treatment has been reported in previous works [9][10].Thus, the amount of acicular ferrite increases as allotriomorphic ferrite is formed along the austenite grain boundaries because saturation of nucleation sites occurs. However, if pearlite transformation follows the allotriomorphic ferrite one, there will not be untransformed austenite to obtain a massive acicular ferrite transformation as temperatu...