2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.12.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precipitation synthesis and magnetic properties of self-assembled magnetite-chitosan nanostructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Characterisation results for the synthesized magnetite revealed the presence of peaks at 21, 24, 35, 40, 50, 61, 63, 69, and 74 theta degrees. As such, the results obtained in this study are in agreement with the existing literature (Tipsawat et al, 2018, Bezdorozhev et al, 2017, Tahar et al, 2018. Moreover, quantitative results revealed that there was no presence of other peaks in magnetite's diffraction pattern, which, if existed, could suggest the existence of other impurities in the matrices of the synthesized mineral.…”
Section: Magnetitesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Characterisation results for the synthesized magnetite revealed the presence of peaks at 21, 24, 35, 40, 50, 61, 63, 69, and 74 theta degrees. As such, the results obtained in this study are in agreement with the existing literature (Tipsawat et al, 2018, Bezdorozhev et al, 2017, Tahar et al, 2018. Moreover, quantitative results revealed that there was no presence of other peaks in magnetite's diffraction pattern, which, if existed, could suggest the existence of other impurities in the matrices of the synthesized mineral.…”
Section: Magnetitesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…At the temperature of 300 K magnetization curves of both samples show an insignificant coercive field value and remnant magnetization (Table 4), which is characteristic for the superparamagnetic behavior [29]. The obtained Mr/Ms values of 0.147 and 0.140 for mPGMT and mPGMT-deta, respectively, are in the range from 0.1 to 0.5, which indicates that the samples exhibit almost uniform magnetization [30].…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…PGMT 249 295 346 510 270 13 354 65 473 20 1 mPGMT 294 335 358 505 277 4 357 68 469 18 9 mPGMT-deta 237 295 417 554 253 4 343 28 440 51 8 Incorporation of magnetite increased the thermal stability of mPGMT in comparison to PGMT since the observed initial decomposition temperatures (T0) for these samples are 210 and 192 o C, respectively. Magnetite retarded thermal degradation via its strong interactions with the copolymer chains [30]. Almost full decomposition was observed for the PGMT sample since the residue is about 1 wt.%.…”
Section: Tg Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…La síntesis de un composito de magnetita/quitosano dependiendo de los parámetros de reacción, la morfología de las nanopartículas obtenidas varía desde esféricas, forma de semilla de arroz hasta forma de grumos, todo esto usando cloruro de hierro como precursor y urea como agente precipitante. El tiempo de reacción es el que determinó la morfología, pues en 10 hr de reacción se obtuvieron nanopartículas esféricas, mientras que en 50 hr de reacción generaron nanopartículas con forma de semilla de arroz [32]. Se ha estudiado por otra parte en el campo ambiental para eliminación fotocatalítica de compuestos orgánicos como nitrobenceno [33] e isatina [25].…”
Section: Magnetita (Fe3o4)unclassified